IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v13y2009i1660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurial culture: a comparative study of entrepreneurs in Brazil and Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Antonio Oliveira Monteiro da Silva
  • Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes
  • Manuela Faia Correia

Abstract

This article describes research concerning with identifying and explaining similarities and differences in characteristics of entrepreneurs in incubators in Brazil and Portugal. The analytical fundamentals for the comparisons were Hofstede's cultural dimension model and entrepreneurial orientation (Lumpkim & Dess, 1996). The use of these two models relied on the application of a questionnaire to entrepreneurs in these two countries, and the research was therefore based on intensive field work, which was crucial to achieving the desired goals. Results from the research revealed that there were differences in cultural dimensions - power distance and uncertainty avoidance, both higher in Brazil. The entrepreneurial orientation was also higher in Brazil, especially risk-taking and competitive aggressiveness. The Brazilian entrepreneurs were more likely to reject future uncertainties and showed a greater propensity to take risks and expose themselves to uncertainty, as long as they were paid for this exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Antonio Oliveira Monteiro da Silva & Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes & Manuela Faia Correia, 2009. "Entrepreneurial culture: a comparative study of entrepreneurs in Brazil and Portugal," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 13(1), pages 57-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:13:y:2009:i:1:660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/660/657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/660/657
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:13:y:2009:i:1:660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.