IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v27y2014i1no3p73-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Malaysia دراسة البنوك الإسلامية والتقليدية في ماليزيا

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Fan Fah

    (Professor at the Economics Faculty of the University Putra Malaysia (UPM).)

  • Abbas Hassani

    (University Putra Malaysia.)

Abstract

Many scholars have researched comparison of conventional and Islamic banking systems, with regards to their performance from time to time. This study compares their respective profitability in terms of volume and volatility of their deposits and loans in Malaysia in a six years period (2006-2011) that other writers have not discussed in detail. The results in this study indicate that there are positive and significant relationships between volume of loans and volume of customers’ deposits and profitability of banks. However, volatility of loans and deposits does not have a significant impact on banks’ profit-efficiency in Malaysia. The results of this research also reveal that Malaysian conventional banks were more profitable than Islamic banks during the period of study. The ROA and ROE are significantly different and mean of ROA and ROE in conventional banks are higher than those in Islamic banks. The main contribution of banks’ profits comes from the spread between the interest earned on loans and the return payable on customer deposits. Both of these are internal factors. Volume of loans and volume of deposits are found to have significant influence on banks’ profitability. Therefore, managers and banks’ administrators should either focus their attention on these two determinants or adopt some kind of policies that will lead banks to increase their volume of loans and deposits to boost banks profitability level. دأب كثير من العلماء على إجراء البحوث من حين لأخر للمقارنة بين انظمة البنوك الإسلامية والتقليدية فيما يتعلق بأدائها. هذه الدراسة تقارن بين ربحية كل منهما حسب حجم وتقلب إيداعاتها وقروضها في ماليزيا خلال فترة ست سنوات (2006-2011م) وهي جوانب لم يتطرق إليها الكتاب الآخرون بشكل مفصل. وتشير نتائج هذه الدراسة إلى وجود علاقات إيجابية ومعنوية بين حجم القروض وحجم ايداعات العملاء وربحية البنوك. ومع ذلك فإن التقلبات في القروض والايداعات ليس لها تأثير معنوي على الكفاءة الربحية للبنوك الماليزية. كما تشير نتائج هذا البحث إلى أن البنوك التقليدية بماليزيا كانت أكثر ربحية من البنوك الإسلامية خلال فترة الدراسة. كما أن العائد على الأصول والعائد على حقوق المساهمين مختلفان معنويًا، كما أن متوسط العائد على الأصول ومتوسط العائد على حقوق المساهمين في البنوك التقليدية أعلى من مثيلتها في البنوك الإسلامية. وتأتي المساهمة الرئيسية لأرباح البنوك من الفرق بين الفائدة المكتسبة على القروض والعائد المدفوع على إيداعات العملاء. وكلا العاملين يعتبران من العوامل الداخلية. ولقد تبين أن حجم القروض وحجم الايداعات لهما تاثير معنوي على ربحية البنوك. لذا يجب على المدراء والإداريين العاملين في البنوك أما تركيز اهتمامهم على المحددين المذكورين أو تبني بعض أنواع من السياسات التي ستساعد البنوك على زيادة حجم قروضها وإيداعاتها لرفع مستوى ربحيتها.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Fan Fah & Abbas Hassani, 2014. "A Study of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Malaysia دراسة البنوك الإسلامية والتقليدية في ماليزيا," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 27(1), pages 73-99, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:27:y:2014:i:1:no:3:p:73-99
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.27-1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153875_27-1-04-Cheng.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.27-1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Loayza & Rashmi Shankar, 2000. "Private Saving in India," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 14(3), pages 571-594, September.
    2. Duo Qin, 2003. "Determinants of household savings in China and their role in quasi‐money supply," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 11(3), pages 513-537, September.
    3. Olson, Dennis & Zoubi, Taisier A., 2008. "Using accounting ratios to distinguish between Islamic and conventional banks in the GCC region," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 45-65, March.
    4. Chong, Beng Soon & Liu, Ming-Hua, 2009. "Islamic banking: Interest-free or interest-based?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 125-144, January.
    5. Khan, Feisal, 2010. "How 'Islamic' is Islamic Banking?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 805-820, December.
    6. Pradeep Agrawal, 2001. "The relation between savings and growth: cointegration and causality evidence from Asia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 499-513.
    7. Munawar Iqbal & Philip Molyneux, 2005. "Thirty Years of Islamic Banking," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-50322-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan, M. Kabir & Aliyu, Sirajo, 2018. "A contemporary survey of islamic banking literature," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 12-43.
    2. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    3. Khediri, Karim Ben & Charfeddine, Lanouar & Youssef, Slah Ben, 2015. "Islamic versus conventional banks in the GCC countries: A comparative study using classification techniques," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 75-98.
    4. Hamidi, M. Luthfi & Worthington, Andrew C., 2018. "Islamic Social Banking: The Way Forward," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(1), pages 179-190.
    5. Mr. Enrique A Gelbard & Mr. Mumtaz Hussain & Mr. Rodolfo Maino & Mr. Yibin Mu & Mr. Etienne B Yehoue, 2014. "Islamic Finance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status and Prospects," IMF Working Papers 2014/149, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Omneya Abdelsalam & Marwa Elnahass & Sabur Mollah, 2018. "Asset Securitization and Risk: Does Bank Type Matter?," Working Papers 2018-15, Swansea University, School of Management.
    7. Ajili, Wissem & Gara, Zeineb Ben, 2013. "Quel Avenir Pour La Finance Islamique En Tunisie ?," Etudes en Economie Islamique, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 7, pages 31-70.
    8. Grira, Jocelyn & Hassan, M. Kabir & Soumaré, Issouf, 2016. "Pricing beliefs: Empirical evidence from the implied cost of deposit insurance for Islamic banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 152-168.
    9. Paolo Giudici & Shatha Hashem, 2015. "Systemic risk of Islamic Banks," DEM Working Papers Series 103, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    10. Muhammad Nouman & Karim Ullah & Saleem Gul, 2018. "Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-32, March.
    11. Olson, Dennis & Zoubi, Taisier, 2017. "Convergence in bank performance for commercial and Islamic banks during and after the Global Financial Crisis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 71-87.
    12. Bitar, Mohammad & Madiès, Philippe & Taramasco, Ollivier, 2017. "What makes Islamic banks different? A multivariate approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 215-235.
    13. Grira, Jocelyn & Labidi, Chiraz, 2021. "Banks, Funds, and risks in islamic finance: Literature & future research avenues," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Louhichi, Awatef & Boujelbene, Younes, 2016. "Credit risk, managerial behaviour and macroeconomic equilibrium within dual banking systems: Interest-free vs. interest-based banking industries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 104-121.
    15. Sarwar Uddin Ahmed & G. M. Wali Ullah & Samiul Parvez Ahmed & Ashikur Rahman, 2016. "An Empirical Study on Corporate Governance and Islamic Bank Performance: A Case Study of Bangladesh," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(4), pages 01-09, July.
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-505 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Doumpos, Michael & Hasan, Iftekhar & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2017. "Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    18. Korkut, Cem & Özgür, Önder, 2017. "Is there a Link between Profit Share Rate of Participation Banks and Interest Rate?[:] The Case of Turkey," MPRA Paper 81642, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Baele, Lieven & Farooq, Moazzam & Ongena, Steven, 2014. "Of religion and redemption: Evidence from default on Islamic loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-159.
    20. Vu Quang Trinh & Marwa Elnahass & Aly Salama, 2021. "Board busyness and new insights into alternative bank dividends models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1289-1328, May.
    21. Sorwar, Ghulam & Pappas, Vasileios & Pereira, John & Nurullah, Mohamed, 2016. "To debt or not to debt: Are Islamic banks less risky than conventional banks?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(S), pages 113-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:27:y:2014:i:1:no:3:p:73-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.