IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v23y2010i2no6p161-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islamic Versus Conventional Mutual Funds Performance in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study أداء الصناديق الاستثمارية الإسلامية مقارنة بأداء الصناديق الاستثمارية التقليدية في المملكة العربية السعودية: دراسة عملية

Author

Listed:
  • Hesham Merdad

    (Department of Economics and Finance University of New Orleans, New Orleans, USA.)

  • M. Kabir Hassan

    (Department of Economics and Finance University of New Orleans, New Orleans, USA)

  • Yasser Alhenawi

    (Department of Economics and Finance University of New Orleans, New Orleans, USA.)

Abstract

Using a sample of Islamic and conventional mutual funds managed by HSBC, the fourth largest fund manager in Saudi Arabia, from January 2003 to January 2010, we examine their risk-return behavior by employing a number of performance measures such as Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen Alpha and their variants. We divide the sample period in four segments such as full period, bull period, bearish period and financial crisis period to analyze further if these two funds performance differ from each other. We also examine the market timing and selectivity of HSBC managers of their portfolio performance. We find that Islamic funds underperform Conventional funds during full period and bullish period, but they overperform conventional funds during bearish and financial crisis period. Such results are consistent with prior studies with other Islamic and conventional mutual funds. HSBC managers are good at showing timing and selectivity for Islamic funds during bearish period, and for conventional funds during bullish period. One important portfolio lesson from this case study is that Islamic mutual funds do offer hedging opportunity for investors during economic downturns because of the restrictions that Islamic law imposes on portfolio selection. باستعمال عينة من الصناديق الإسلامية والتقليدية المدارة من قبل (HSBC)، رابع أكبر مدير صناديق استثمارية في المملكة العربية السعودية، في الفترة الواقعة بين كانون الأول 2003م وكانون الأول 2010م، قمنا بفحص خصائص العائد والمخاطرة لهذه الصناديق باستعمال عدد من مقاييس الأداء مثل نسبة شارب (Sharpe Ratio)، ومعامل ترينر (Treynor)، ومعامل جنسن (Jensen Alpha) بصيغها المختلفة. قمنا بتقسيم فترة الدراسة لأربع فترات تشمل: 1- كامل الفترة المدروسة 2- فترة الصعود 3- فترة الهبوط و4- فترة الأزمة المالية وذلك لتحليل ومقارنة أداء الصناديق المدروسة في كل منها. قمنا أيضا بدراسة توقيت السوق والقدرة الاختيارية لمدراء المحافظ في (HSBC). وجدنا أن الصناديق الإسلامية لا تجاري الصناديق التقليدية في الأداء عند أخذ كامل الفترة المدروسة بعين الاعتبار وكذلك عند التركيز على فترة الصعود. بالمقابل وجدنا أن الصناديق الإسلامية تتفوق في الأداء على نظيرتها التقليدية في فترات الهبوط وفي فترة الأزمة المالية. هذه النتائج بشكل عام تأتي مؤكدة لنتائج دراسات سابقة في هذا المجال. كما تظهر النتائج أن مدراء المحافظ الإسلامية في (HSBC) يملكون قدرة جيدة على توقيت السوق واختيار الأصول في فترات الهبوط بينما مدراء المحافظ التقليدية يملكون قدرة جيدة على توقيت السوق واختيار الأصول في فترات الصعود. أهم الدروس المستفادة من الدراسة العملية هذه أن الصناديق الإسلامية تقدم للمستثمرين تحوطاً جيداُ في فترات الركود الاقتصادي بسبب القواعد التي يفرضها الاستثمار الإسلامي على اختيار الأصول.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesham Merdad & M. Kabir Hassan & Yasser Alhenawi, 2010. "Islamic Versus Conventional Mutual Funds Performance in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study أداء الصناديق الاستثمارية الإسلامية مقارنة بأداء الصناديق الاستثمارية التقليدية في المملكة العربية السعودية: دراسة عم," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 23(2), pages 161-198, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:23:y:2010:i:2:no:6:p:161-198
    DOI: 10.4197/islec.23-2.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153879_IEI-VOL-23-2-06E-Kabir.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/islec.23-2.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    2. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    3. Kon, Stanley J & Jen, Frank C, 1979. "The Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: An Empirical Investigation of Timing, Selectivity, and Market Efficiency," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(2), pages 263-289, April.
    4. Hayat, Raphie & Kraeussl, Roman, 2011. "Risk and return characteristics of Islamic equity funds," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 189-203, June.
    5. Aggarwal, Rajesh K & Yousef, Tarik, 2000. "Islamic Banks and Investment Financing," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(1), pages 93-120, February.
    6. Alan Gregory & John Matatko & Robert Luther, 1997. "Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 705-725.
    7. Treynor, Jack L & Black, Fischer, 1973. "How to Use Security Analysis to Improve Portfolio Selection," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(1), pages 66-86, January.
    8. Alan Gregory & John Matatko & Robert Luther, 1997. "Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 705-725, June.
    9. Kon, Stanley J, 1983. "The Market-Timing Performance of Mutual Fund Managers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(3), pages 323-347, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shafiqur Rahman & Cheng-Few Lee & Yaqing Xiao, 2017. "The investment performance, attributes, and investment behavior of ethical equity mutual funds in the US: an empirical investigation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 91-116, July.
    2. Hassan, M. Kabir & Girard, Eric, 2010. "Faith-Based Ethical Investing: The Case Of Dow Jones Islamic Indexes," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 17, pages 1-31.
    3. Fadillah Mansor & M. Ishaq Bhatti & Shafiqur Rahman & Hung Quang Do, 2020. "The Investment Performance of Ethical Equity Funds in Malaysia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Francisco Climent & Paula Mollá & Pilar Soriano, 2020. "The Investment Performance of U.S. Islamic Mutual Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Derwall, Jeroen & Koedijk, Kees & Ter Horst, Jenke, 2011. "A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 2137-2147, August.
    6. Jeroen Derwall & Kees Koedijk, 2009. "Socially Responsible Fixed‐Income Funds," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1‐2), pages 210-229, January.
    7. Bauer, Rob & Koedijk, Kees & Otten, Roger, 2005. "International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1751-1767, July.
    8. Sebastian Lobe & Christian Walkshäusl, 2016. "Vice versus virtue investing around the world," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 303-344, March.
    9. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    10. Michael Schröder, 2007. "Is there a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 331-348, January.
    11. Rob Bauer & Jeroen Derwall & Rogér Otten, 2007. "The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 111-124, January.
    12. Renneboog, Luc & Ter Horst, Jenke & Zhang, Chendi, 2008. "The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 302-322, June.
    13. Jedynak Tomasz, 2017. "Is it Worth Being Good? – The Efficiency and Risk of Socially Responsible Investing in Light of Various Empirical Studies," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Alexander Kempf & Peer Osthoff, 2008. "SRI Funds: Nomen est Omen," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9‐10), pages 1276-1294, November.
    15. Stewart Jones & Sandra van der Laan & Geoff Frost & Janice Loftus, 2008. "The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 181-203, June.
    16. Fernando Mu�oz & Ruth Vicente & Luis Ferruz, 2015. "Stock-picking and style-timing abilities: a comparative analysis of conventional and socially responsible mutual funds in the US market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 345-358, February.
    17. Laura Fabregat-Aibar & M. Glòria Barberà-Mariné & Antonio Terceño & Laia Pié, 2019. "A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Socially Responsible Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Francisco José López-Arceiz & Ana José Bellostas-Pérezgrueso & José Mariano Moneva, 2018. "Evaluation of the Cultural Environment’s Impact on the Performance of the Socially Responsible Investment Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 259-278, June.
    19. Janusz Brzeszczyński & Graham McIntosh, 2014. "Performance of Portfolios Composed of British SRI Stocks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 335-362, March.
    20. Bauer, Rob & Otten, Roger & Rad, Alireza Tourani, 2006. "Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 33-48, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:23:y:2010:i:2:no:6:p:161-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.