IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v22y2009i2no11p259-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Masudul Alam Choudhury: Islamic critique and alternative to Financial engineering issues, Comment by مسعود العالم شودري: النقد الإسلامي والبديل لقضايا الهندسة المالية ، تعليق: محمد عمر فاروق

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Omar Farooq

Abstract

This is definitely a scholarly paper of sufficient originality. Before I offer my critique, let me summarize the paper and identify its core aspects. 1. It argues that a financial system and its constituents “stand upon the assumptions of behavior, markets and institutions” of their respective methodological worldview. 2. The conventional financial institutions evolved from the Neoclassical worldview, which the author, coming from an Islamic background, totally rejects. ”The central point of risk-return analysis and interest-driven argumentation is shown to arise from the conformable preference, market and institutional ramifications of such argumentation in mainstream financial engineering. All these are premised on the epistemology of mainstream neoliberal and neoclassical worldview.” 3. Islam has its own methodological worldview and therefore Islamic financial system must be derived from its own Islamic worldview. ”In the case of the Islamic alternative, the mainstream financial engineering arguments and applications must be thorough revamped. Such an extensive transformation emanates from Islamic epistemological foundation, just as rationalism and economic rationality define the epistemological outlook of neo-liberalism and neoclassicism.” --

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Omar Farooq, 2009. "Masudul Alam Choudhury: Islamic critique and alternative to Financial engineering issues, Comment by مسعود العالم شودري: النقد الإسلامي والبديل لقضايا الهندسة المالية ، تعليق: محمد عمر فاروق," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 22(2), pages 259-266, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:22:y:2009:i:2:no:11:p:259-266
    DOI: 10.4197/islec.22-2.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153880_IEI-VOL-22-2-11E-Farooq.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/islec.22-2.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken Dennis, 1996. "A logical critique of mathematical formalism in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 151-169.
    2. Clive Beed & Owen Kane, 1991. "What Is the Critique of the Mathematization of Economics?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 581-612, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiago Cardão-Pito, 2021. "Academic discipline of economics as hedonist philosophy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 199-207, November.
    2. Paul Gopuran Devassy Bino & Sasidharan Subash & Ananthakrishnan Ramanathan, 2005. "Concentration in Knowledge Output: A case of Economics Journals," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 2(2), pages 261-279, December.
    3. Tiago Cardao‐Pito, 2012. "Intangible Flow Theory," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 328-353, April.
    4. Steve Fleetwood, 2001. "Causal Laws, Functional Relations and Tendencies," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 201-220.
    5. Tomer, John F., 2007. "What is behavioral economics?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 463-479, June.
    6. Tiago Cardao-Pito, 2017. "Organizations as Producers of Operating Product Flows to Members of Society," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    7. Bruno S. Frey & Reiner Eichenberger, 1993. "American and European Economics and Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 185-193, Fall.
    8. Dennis L. Weisman, 2021. "The Mathematical Revolution in Economics: Factor Flows in the Production of Academics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 66(2), pages 202-221, October.
    9. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2014. "Mathematical Psychics and Hydraulics: The Methodological Influence of Edgeworth and Fisher," MPRA Paper 52981, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Stavros A. DRAKOPOULOS, 2016. "Economic crisis, economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 28-57, November.
    11. C. P. Kwong, 2009. "Mathematical analysis of Soros's theory of reflexivity," Papers 0901.4447, arXiv.org.
    12. T.A. Boylan & P.F. O'Gorman, 2007. "Axiomatization And Formalism In Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 426-446, July.
    13. Turan Yay & Huseyin Tastan, 2010. "Invisible Hand in the Process of Making Economics or on the Method and Scope of Economics," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 57(1), pages 61-83, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:22:y:2009:i:2:no:11:p:259-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.