Author
Listed:
- Nona Abashidze
(Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health Care, Department of Chemistry, Batumi)
- Maia Vanidze
(Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health Care, Department of Chemistry, Batumi)
- Maia Kharadze
(Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health Care, Department of Chemistry, Batumi)
- Indira Djaparidze
(Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health Care, Department of Chemistry, Batumi)
- Aleko Kalandia
(Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health Care, Department of Chemistry, Batumi)
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine the content of four mineral elements in honeys originating from different regions of West Georgia. Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and Ammonium (NH4+) were analyzed by HPLC-Conductivity, column “Cation” (3.9x150mm) solvent 0.1 mM EDTA 3mM HNO3, following the microwave digestion of the honey. High mineral contents were observed in the investigated honeys with K, Na, Ca and Mg being the most abundant elements with mean concentrations in Chestnut honey 5000-7000 ppm, 56-150 ppm, 40-230 ppm, 25-130 ppm, respectively. In Lime (Tilia) honey - 2400-2600 ppm, 30-50 ppm, 160-180 ppm, 45-60 ppm, Acacia honey 300-500 ppm, 35-45 ppm, 85-95 ppm, 15-25 ppm, Field honey -750-930 ppm, 35-45 ppm, 75-130 ppm, 25-35 ppm, Spring polyflora honey - 630-650 ppm, 45-50 ppm, 280-300 ppm, 25-35 ppm, Autumn polyflora Honey – 2500-3000 ppm, 80-100 ppm, 250-300 ppm, 80-100 ppm respectively. The correlation dependence was between the content of cations in the honey and conductivity (Chestnut honey 1.4 µs/cm, Lime (Tilia), honey 0.5 µs/cm, Acacia honey 0.16 µs/cm, Field honey 0.55 µs/cm, Spring polyflora honey 1.2 µs/cm, Autumn polyflora Honey 1.3 µs/cm)
Suggested Citation
Nona Abashidze & Maia Vanidze & Maia Kharadze & Indira Djaparidze & Aleko Kalandia, 2018.
"West Georgian Honey Cations,"
CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 6(0), pages 990-994, September.
Handle:
RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:990-994
DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v6.1283
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:6:y:2018:i:0:p:990-994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.