IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/iseicj/v4y2016i0p531-543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Adoption Of Mandatory E-Government Systems: Notarial System In Albania, An Empirical Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Agim Kasaj

    (European University of Tirana)

Abstract

E-Government has high priority for governments worldwide, with much effort and money being invested into government digital initiatives. For such efforts to be worthy, a high rate of adoption of e-government is needed. Technology adoption is one of the most mature areas in information technology (IT) research and many adoption models have been developed for this purpose. Most studies in this field have been focused on voluntary use of systems and mainly from a business context, with minor emphasize on an e-government. A major distinction between technologies of e-government and other online technologies, is that the use of certain e-government technologies is mandatory, rather than voluntary. This paper provides a short introduction of e-government, followed by a review of the most well-known information technology (IT) adoption models at the individual level. Using previous research results, the study will identify the determinant constructs and their relationship for adoption of the digital notarial system of Albania. Finally, the paper proposes a theoretical framework for private professional adoption of mandatory e-government information systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Agim Kasaj, 2016. "User Adoption Of Mandatory E-Government Systems: Notarial System In Albania, An Empirical Analyse," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 4(0), pages 531-543, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:4:y:2016:i:0:p:531-543
    DOI: 10.12955/cbup.v4.810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC/article/view/810/901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/cbup.v4.810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:iseicj:v:4:y:2016:i:0:p:531-543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/CBUIC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.