IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i2p696-703id5290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of HOG and LBP feature extraction techniques in AdaBoost for image recognition

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz Ilyas Ozturk
  • Osman Yildirim

Abstract

Arachnoid cysts are cerebrospinal fluid-filled sacs located between the brain or spinal cord and the arachnoid membrane. Detection of these cysts is critical for early diagnosis and treatment planning. In this study, deep learning algorithms were developed and applied to improve the detection of arachnoid cysts in brain MRI scans. Two separate feature extraction methods, namely Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), combined with the AdaBoost classifier, were tested. The results showed that the AdaBoost classifier with LBP achieved an accuracy of 0.77, while the AdaBoost classifier with HOG performed significantly better with an accuracy of 0.95. These findings suggest that HOG features are more effective in distinguishing arachnoid cysts from normal brain tissue. This study contributes to the growing body of research on automatic brain anomaly detection and highlights the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy using advanced machine learning techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz Ilyas Ozturk & Osman Yildirim, 2025. "A comparative analysis of HOG and LBP feature extraction techniques in AdaBoost for image recognition," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 696-703.
    • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:696-703:id:5290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/5290/881
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:696-703:id:5290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.