IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i2p2419-2440id5704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ergonomic risk analysis for drone pilots

Author

Listed:
  • Rubén Rodríguez Elizalde

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the ergonomic risks faced by drone pilots, focusing on postural chal-lenges during flight operations. The research investigates how these postures may contribute to musculoskeletal disorders and proposes corrective measures to mitigate these risks. The study utilized the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) methodology to evaluate the postures adopted by drone pilots during real flight operations. Observations were conducted across multiple work cycles involving two drone pilots operating in different environments. Angular measurements of various body segments were captured and analysed to determine ergonomic risk levels. The analysis identified five key postures that posed varying levels of ergonomic risk. Three postures were found to require possible adjustments, while two required task redesign due to significant musculoskeletal strain. Key risk factors included prolonged wrist extension, neck flexion, and static load caused by the control console's design and the pilot’s need to maintain visual contact with the drone. The study concludes that ergonomic risks for drone pilots are significant and require proactive interventions. Recommendations include adopting improved console designs, incor-porating harness support systems, modifying operational protocols to improve body positioning, and utilizing alternative equipment like larger display screens to reduce neck strain. The findings offer actionable insights for drone operators, ergonomics specialists, and employers to implement ergonomic improvements in drone piloting tasks. These changes aim to reduce musculoskeletal disorders, improve working conditions, and enhance overall safety in drone operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubén Rodríguez Elizalde, 2025. "Ergonomic risk analysis for drone pilots," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 2419-2440.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:2419-2440:id:5704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/5704/1034
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:2419-2440:id:5704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.