IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i2p2278-2284id5680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological and psychological aspects of proctoring on-line tests from the participants' perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Klement
  • Tomáš Dragon
  • Květoslav Bártek

Abstract

Privacy is often cited as a major issue in online testing using technological proctoring methods. In fact, this is perceived by test participants as the most significant aspect which has a major impact on the level of trust in the online testing environment. Even though the limitations related to the pandemic situation have already subsided, online testing has proven to be one of the ways to increase the efficiency of some important activities related to the agenda of higher education institutions. Although efficiency and flexibility of deployment is one of the undeniable advantages of online testing, it is necessary to emphasize that online testing using online proctoring systems raises some concerns among the participants, which may also have a negative impact on their results. For this reason, a research survey was conducted among the participants of the online admissions tests, in order to find out their readiness, but also the specific concerns and expectations that online proctoring brings from their perspective. Thus, although most respondents reported serious concerns about the use of online proctoring (e.g., concerns about privacy, psychological well-being, etc.), they did not fundamentally question the process per se and in many cases appreciated its benefits in enhancing protection against fraudulent behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Klement & Tomáš Dragon & Květoslav Bártek, 2025. "Technological and psychological aspects of proctoring on-line tests from the participants' perspective," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 2278-2284.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:2278-2284:id:5680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/5680/1024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:2278-2284:id:5680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.