IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i2p12-25id5090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the quality of science teachers' practices in employing formative assessment as a learning tool to enhance children's primary science learning

Author

Listed:
  • Rommel Mahmoud AlAli
  • Ali Ahmad Al-Barakat

Abstract

This study examined the quality of science teachers' practices in employing formative assessment as a learning tool to enhance children's primary science learning. The research sample consisted of 30 randomly selected male and female teachers from Jordanian primary schools during the second semester of the 2023/2024 academic year. To assess these practices, a verbal rating scale was developed as a classroom observation instrument, incorporating ten criteria for assessing the quality of formative assessments. Each criterion included several performance indicators, totaling 38 indicators that represent formative assessment practices. The findings revealed that the overall quality of these practices was consistently low, with all practices classified within the "low" practice degree. This indicates a significant gap in adherence to formative assessment quality standards in science learning environments. Additionally, non-parametric analysis showed no significant correlation between the quality of these practices and the teachers' gender or teaching experience. The study concludes with a set of recommendations aimed at improving the quality of formative assessment practices in science learning environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rommel Mahmoud AlAli & Ali Ahmad Al-Barakat, 2025. "Assessing the quality of science teachers' practices in employing formative assessment as a learning tool to enhance children's primary science learning," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 12-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:12-25:id:5090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/5090/819
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:12-25:id:5090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.