IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i1p2575-2581id5032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal framework for defining the continental shelf in light of article 76 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea: A comparative study with the maritime zones law of Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Yahya Abobaker

Abstract

International maritime law relies on coastal governments' continental shelf sovereignty. This law regulates marine resources outside territorial waters. This study compares the Saudi Maritime Zones Law (SMZL) to The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Article 76, which establishes the continental shelf. This analysis compares SMZL with UNCLOS legislation, particularly Article 17 and Article 76, which define the continental shelf (CS). The study found a high agreement between Saudi and international law, and Saudi law protects Saudi Arabia's national interests better. Due to SMZL, the Kingdom has exclusive rights to use continental shelf natural resources. The comparative study highlighted how SMZL follows UNCLOS and how Saudi Arabia protects its sovereignty and resources. The research emphasizes aligning Saudi Arabian legislation with international norms, updating local maritime laws to reflect technological advances, and encouraging international cooperation to conserve marine resources. It also emphasizes learning about CS sovereign rights. The findings suggest amending UNCLOS Article 76 to accommodate modern challenges like technological innovation, environmental sustainability, and maritime sovereignty. International cooperation is encouraged to promote fair and sustainable marine resource usage, with national legislative frameworks like SMZL Article 17 supporting international standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Yahya Abobaker, 2025. "Legal framework for defining the continental shelf in light of article 76 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea: A comparative study with the maritime zones law of Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 2575-2581.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:2575-2581:id:5032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/5032/789
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:2575-2581:id:5032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.