IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v8y2025i1p1450-1461id4669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The assessment on the use of artificial intelligence writing tools as a confidant of business administration student-researchers using technology acceptance model

Author

Listed:
  • Fhrizz S De Jesus
  • Annalene Grace E Co

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has steadily made its way into the academic world; its capabilities have expanded, enabling it to play a more integral role in academic research and writing in various fields like business administration. This research aims to assess the use of Artificial Intelligence writing tools by Business Administration Student-Researchers from Region III in terms of perceived usefulness, ease of use of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), perceived attitude towards technology, subjective norms, and facilitating conditions. Additionally, it aims to categorize the students in terms of sex, form of AI writing tools used, and frequency of exposure to AI to determine its relation to their perception of using AI writing tools. This study employed a quantitative descriptive methodology, involving a statistical analysis of frequency and percentage, weighted mean, and Pearson r. In gathering data, the instrument used by the researchers was a questionnaire that underwent expert validation and a series of trial testing. As a result, it was found that most of the Business Administration student-researchers were female, who mostly used grammar and style checkers as a form of writing tool, and tended to use it depending on the situation. It was also found that perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, attitude towards technology, and facilitating conditions are major factors affecting the comfort and acceptance of the students in using Artificial Intelligence in research writing. It was also reported that using AI writing tools presented challenges such as inaccurate responses, difficulty of use, fear of potential dependency, lack of institutional support, and limited access to technology. Finally, it is recommended that institutions take action regarding the growing number of AI tools to better integrate their capabilities for the research writing of students. By conducting seminars, webinars, and training, and tailoring the functions of AI, this could help students use AI more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Fhrizz S De Jesus & Annalene Grace E Co, 2025. "The assessment on the use of artificial intelligence writing tools as a confidant of business administration student-researchers using technology acceptance model," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 1450-1461.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1450-1461:id:4669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/4669/692
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1450-1461:id:4669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.