IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aac/ijirss/v3y2020i1p27-32id30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the effectiveness of conventional and Kano model questionnaire for gathering requirement of online bus reservation system

Author

Listed:
  • Shahwali Shahidi

Abstract

Software development is the activity of creating a software system that when used, solves some unsolved problem. It consists many knowledge intensive processes, among which requirement elicitation process is perhaps the most critical for the success of the software system. The success or failure of the system is related to the quality of the elicitation process and to the method used for gathering user needs. This study examines combined approaches to identify and classify the requirements and investigates the importance of customer satisfaction in requirement elicitation for online bus reservation system. The context of this work is University Malaysia Pahang (UMP). The target audiences are public who uses bus services. A total 63 out of 70 questionnaire are answered by the people. To do this, the design of two types of questionnaires: conventional and Kano questionnaire is done and implemented to identify the correct requirements for the selected system and then to compare the effectiveness of these two approaches. This study found that, both conventional method and Kano model are suitable to find and classify the requirements, but for deeper understanding of requirements which have the greatest influence on the customer's satisfaction, Kano model is more effective, because Kano's method provides valuable help when trade-off is needed for designing the product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahwali Shahidi, 2020. "Comparing the effectiveness of conventional and Kano model questionnaire for gathering requirement of online bus reservation system," International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Innovative Research Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 27-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:27-32:id:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/30/135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/article/view/30/204
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aac:ijirss:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:27-32:id:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Jean (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijirss.com/index.php/ijirss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.