IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v10y2018i4p442-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insight into Gender Differences in Higher Education: Evidence from Peer Reviews in an Introductory STEM Course

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Ng Lane

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Bruce Ankenman

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208; Segal Design Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Seyed Iravani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

Abstract

As the service industry moves toward self-service, peer feedback serves a critical role in this shift for educational services. Peer feedback is a process by which students provide feedback to each other. One of its major benefits is that it enables students to become actively involved in the learning and assessment process and play an integral role in the delivery and quality of their education. However, a primary concern is that students do not consistently provide each other with quality feedback, especially in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines in which gender stereotypes may hinder the ability of women to provide critical peer feedback. A potential way to improve peer feedback is to create anonymous review settings. This study examines how anonymity alters the nature of peer feedback in a large introductory undergraduate statistics class for computer science and engineering majors. In this class, peers review a series of team video projects as either anonymous or nonanonymous reviewers. Our results show that female peer reviewers were more affected by the anonymity setting than the male peer reviewers. We discuss the implications of these findings for promoting greater participation and retention of women in underrepresented STEM disciplines and the design of effective peer-review processes for improved student achievement and satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Ng Lane & Bruce Ankenman & Seyed Iravani, 2018. "Insight into Gender Differences in Higher Education: Evidence from Peer Reviews in an Introductory STEM Course," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 442-456, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:442-456
    DOI: serv.2018.0224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/serv.2018.0224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/serv.2018.0224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiesler, Sara & Sproull, Lee, 1992. "Group decision making and communication technology," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 96-123, June.
    2. Jerry A. Jacobs & Sarah E. Winslow, 2004. "Overworked Faculty: Job Stresses and Family Demands," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 596(1), pages 254-255, November.
    3. Mike Thelwall & David Wilkinson & Sukhvinder Uppal, 2010. "Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 190-199, January.
    4. Jerry A. Jacobs & Sarah E. Winslow, 2004. "Overworked Faculty: Job Stresses and Family Demands," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 596(1), pages 104-129, November.
    5. Terry Connolly & Leonard M. Jessup & Joseph S. Valacich, 1990. "Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 689-703, June.
    6. Gerardine DeSanctis & R. Brent Gallupe, 1987. "A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 589-609, May.
    7. Mike Thelwall & David Wilkinson & Sukhvinder Uppal, 2010. "Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 190-199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zehui Zhan & Yuanmin Li & Hu Mei & Siyuan Lyu, 2023. "Key competencies acquired from STEM education: gender-differentiated parental expectations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. H. Jung & Christoph Schneider & Joseph Valacich, 2010. "Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 724-742, April.
    2. Terri L. Griffith & Mark A. Fuller & Gregory B. Northcraft, 1998. "Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 20-36, March.
    3. Mi, Hwang, 1998. "Did Task Type Matter in the Use of Decision Room GSS? A Critical Review and a Meta-analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf & Azmawati Mohammed Nawi & Noorlaili Mohd Tauhid & Hanita Othman & Mohd Rizam Abdul Rahman & Hanizah Mohd Yusoff & Nazarudin Safian & Pei Yuen Ng & Zahara Abdul Manaf & Nor Ba’y, 2021. "Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life amongst Employees in a Malaysian Public University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Daily, Bonnie F. & Teich, Jeffrey E., 2001. "Perceptions of contribution in multi-cultural groups in non-GDSS and GDSS environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 70-83, October.
    7. Colin Eden & Fran Ackermann, 2001. "Group Decision and Negotiation in Strategy Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 119-140, March.
    8. Liwen Vaughan, 2016. "Uncovering information from social media hyperlinks: An investigation of twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1105-1120, May.
    9. Bhappu, Anita D. & Griffith, Terri L. & Northcraft, Gregory B., 1997. "Media Effects and Communication Bias in Diverse Groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 199-205, June.
    10. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 2017. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 101-119, March.
    11. F. Schweitzer & D. Garcia, 2010. "An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 77(4), pages 533-545, October.
    12. Meng Ma & Ritu Agarwal, 2007. "Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 42-67, March.
    13. Karacapilidis, Nikos I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1997. "A framework for group decision support systems: Combining AI tools and OR techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 373-388, December.
    14. Alain Pinsonneault & Henri Barki & R. Brent Gallupe & Norberto Hoppen, 1999. "Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 110-133, June.
    15. Li, Xianghua & Wang, Zhen & Gao, Chao & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Reasoning human emotional responses from large-scale social and public media," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 182-193.
    16. Anupriya Khan & Satish Krishnan & Jithesh Arayankalam, 2022. "The Role of ICT Laws and National Culture in Determining ICT Diffusion and Well-Being: A Cross-Country Examination," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 415-440, April.
    17. Ibtesam AbdulAziz Bajri & Nada Abdulmajeed Lashkar, 2020. "Saudi Gender Emotional Expressions in Using Instagram," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-94, May.
    18. Russell Haines & Jill Hough & Lan Cao & Douglas Haines, 2014. "Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 765-786, July.
    19. Roser Beneito-Montagut, 2017. "Emotions, Everyday Life, and the Social Web: Age, Gender, and Social Web Engagement Effects on Online Emotional Expression," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 87-104, December.
    20. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 0. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:442-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.