IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2p798-812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Differences as a Challenge of Leaders in the Process of Building Commitment of Employees in a Public Organization – An Empirical Research

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Jablonska-Woloszyn
  • Dorota Kurek

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims to show what challenges stem from employees' generational diversity and determine the level of engagement that leaders face in a public organization, using the example of the army. Design/Methodology/Approach: To answer the research problem, an analysis of the source literature (both Polish and foreign) together with a diagnostic survey was carried out with the use of questionnaire techniques on a sample of 158 soldiers – students and attendees of the courses conducted at the War Studies University in Warsaw. The results of the research were subjected to statistical analysis, which allowed to answer the research problem. Findings: The conducted research confirmed the existence of different thinking patterns of the representatives of generations X, Y, and Z, which constitutes a challenge for commanders in the army. The differences were noticed, especially about generation Z in the scope of interpersonal relations, teamwork, and work organization. Practical Implications: The results of the research are significant in the process of building the commitment of employees in public institutions. They reveal differences in the needs and expectations of a multigenerational team, which undoubtedly spur challenges for the leader to reconcile these needs and directly impact the level of commitment and, therefore, the ability to achieve the set goals. Originality/Value: The research provides theoretical assumptions and practical answers to encourage further research globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Jablonska-Woloszyn & Dorota Kurek, 2021. "Intergenerational Differences as a Challenge of Leaders in the Process of Building Commitment of Employees in a Public Organization – An Empirical Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 798-812.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:798-812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2156/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel R. Denison & Robert Hooijberg & Robert E. Quinn, 1995. "Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(5), pages 524-540, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ipg:wpaper:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. David Audretsch & Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada, 2023. "From entrepreneurship to leadership," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 814-820, April.
    3. Vera Bitsch & Nicole J. Olynk, 2007. "Skills Required of Managers in Livestock Production: Evidence from Focus Group Research," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 749-764.
    4. Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal, 2013. "Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 241-255, January.
    5. Shao, Yan & Nijstad, Bernard A. & Täuber, Susanne, 2019. "Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 7-19.
    6. Shuanglong Wang & Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Haihua Zhou, 2021. "A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1305-1326, December.
    7. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    8. Willy McCourt, 2018. "Towards “cognitively complex” problem‐solving: Six models of public service reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 748-768, September.
    9. Helena Liu & Christopher Baker, 2016. "Ordinary Aristocrats: The Discursive Construction of Philanthropists as Ethical Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 261-277, January.
    10. Xiaode Ji & Yanzhao Su & Yue Zhang & Hui Wang, 2023. "Making Our Firm More Sustainable: The Role of CEO Vision Communication of Sustainability on Sustainability Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    11. Marko M. Mihić & Zorica A. Dodevska & Marija Lj. Todorović & Vladimir Lj. Obradović & Dejan Č. Petrović, 2018. "Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Ariana Chang & Tian-Shyug Lee & Hsiu-Mei Lee & Jing Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Responsible Leadership on Strategic Agility: Cases from the Taiwan Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-040 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Kelman, Steven & Hong, Sounman, 2012. ""Hard," "Soft," or "Tough Love": What Kinds of Organizational Culture Promote Successful Performance in Cross-Organizational Collaborations?," Working Paper Series rwp12-005, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    15. K. V. James & R. G. Priyadarshini, 2021. "Responsible Leadership: A New Paradigm for Organizational Sustainability," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(4), pages 452-470, November.
    16. Jaime B. Windeler & Likoebe Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2017. "Technical Systems Development Risk Factors: The Role of Empowering Leadership in Lowering Developers’ Stress," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 775-796, December.
    17. Zhang, Yan & Han, Yu-Lan, 2019. "Paradoxical leader behavior in long-term corporate development: Antecedents and consequences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 42-54.
    18. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2017. "The Common Good of the Firm and Humanistic Management: Conscious Capitalism and Economy of Communion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 701-709, November.
    19. Elbanna, Amany & Bunker, Deborah & Levine, Linda & Sleigh, Anthony, 2019. "Emergency management in the changing world of social media: Framing the research agenda with the stakeholders through engaged scholarship," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 112-120.
    20. A. J. Burns & Clay Posey & Tom L. Roberts, 2021. "Insiders’ Adaptations to Security-Based Demands in the Workplace: An Examination of Security Behavioral Complexity," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 343-360, April.
    21. Bonavia, Tomas & Prado, Vicente & Barberá, David, 2009. "Adaptación al castellano y estructura factorial del «Denison Organizational Culture Survey» [Spanish adaptation and factor structure of the «Denison Organizational Culture Survey»]," MPRA Paper 34120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    22. Achim Schmitt & Sebastian Raisch, 2013. "Corporate Turnarounds: The Duality of Retrenchment and Recovery," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7), pages 1216-1244, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intergenerational differences; leader; public organization.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J5 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:798-812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.