Revealed preferences are tastes that rationalize an economic agent's observed actions. Normative preferences represent the agent's actual interests. It sometimes makes sense to assume that revealed preferences are identical to normative preferences. But there are many cases where this assumption is violated. We identify five factors that increase the likelihood of a disparity between revealed preferences and normative preferences: passive choice, complexity, limited personal experience, third-party marketing, and intertemporal choice. We then discuss six approaches that jointly contribute to the identification of normative preferences: structural estimation, active decisions, asymptotic choice, aggregated revealed preferences, reported preferences, and informed preferences. Each of these approaches uses consumer behavior to infer some property of normative preferences without equating revealed and normative preferences. We illustrate these issues with evidence from savings and investment outcomes.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 92 (2008) Issue (Month): 8-9 (August) Pages: 1787-1794 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
John Beshears & James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte C. Madrian, 2008.
"How are Preferences Revealed?,"
NBER Working Papers
13976, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Gabriel D. Carroll & James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte Madrian & Andrew Metrick, 2005.
"Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions,"
NBER Working Papers
11074, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Ted O'Donoghue & Matthew Rabin, 1999.
"Doing It Now or Later,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 89(1), pages 103-124, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte C. Madrian & Andrew Metrick, 2003.
"Optimal Defaults,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 180-185, May.
[Downloadable!]
Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas & Jonathan A. Parker, 2002.
"Consumption Over the Life Cycle,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 47-89, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Sumit Agarwal & John C. Driscoll & Xavier Gabaix & David Laibson, 2008.
"Learning in the Credit Card Market,"
NBER Working Papers
13822, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
John Beshears & James J. Choi & David Laibson & Brigitte C. Madrian, 2006.
"Simplification and Saving,"
NBER Working Papers
12659, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)