IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v136y2024ics0264837723004325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding and evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements with a social-ecological system framework: The case of Chongqing Municipality, China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Runqiu
  • Zhang, Lie
  • Tang, Yudi
  • Jiang, Yongmu

Abstract

The remediation of rural human settlements is receiving increasing attention in contemporary China. Evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements and formulating site-specific remediation strategies are crucial for realizing China's rural revitalization goals. Based on the social-ecological system (SES) theory, this study establishes a theoretical framework for understanding the resilience of rural human settlements. Building upon this framework, an index system for assessing the resilience is constructed across three dimensions: the resource subsystem, the actor subsystem, and the governance subsystem. The study then analyzes the resilience level of rural human settlements and the interactions among these subsystems, using Chongqing Municipality as an example. The main study conclusions are as follows. First, the resilience index of rural human settlements in Chongqing exhibits spatial heterogeneity and imbalances among subsystems. Specifically, the average resilience index of the resource subsystem is lower than that of other subsystems and there is noticeable spatial heterogeneity in resilience indices among different counties. Second, resilience in rural human settlements is a complex outcome resulting from interactions among multiple subsystems within the SES. These subsystems interact through a two-factor enhancement and non-linear enhancement relationship. Third, the main barriers to the resilience in rural human settlements in Chongqing are related to the resource subsystem, particularly per capita wetland resources, followed by challenges within the governance and actor subsystem, such as rural population density. Fourth, the SES theory can better guide the resilience evaluation of rural human settlements. To improve that resilience, we recommend adopting a systemism perspective, treating rural human settlements as SES entities, and paying attention to the important role of rural inhabitants as the main body of environmental governance. Additionally, tailored environmental governance measures should be developed based on the resilience characteristics and interactions between the subsystems. The research results expand the application field of SES theory and provide novel insights and valuable theoretical guidance for studying the resilience of rural human settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Runqiu & Zhang, Lie & Tang, Yudi & Jiang, Yongmu, 2024. "Understanding and evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements with a social-ecological system framework: The case of Chongqing Municipality, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004325
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004325
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deslatte, Aaron & Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna & Tavares, António F. & Ślawska, Justyna & Karsznia, Izabela & Łukomska, Julita, 2022. "Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Rong Tan & Rumei Hu & Arild Vatn, 2021. "What does sustainability demand? An institutionalist analysis with applications to China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 486-514, October.
    3. Stephen Osborne & Arthur Williamson & Rona Beattie, 2002. "Community involvement in rural regeneration partnerships in the UK: Key issues from a three nation study," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 1083-1092.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Yongqiang Liu & Shuang Wang & Zipeng Chen & Shuangshuang Tu, 2022. "Research on the Response of Ecosystem Service Function to Landscape Pattern Changes Caused by Land Use Transition: A Case Study of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Malisa, Emmanuel Timothy & Mahonge, Christopher Paul, 2023. "Implications of institutional interplay on land management: A case of traditional land tenure and formal laws in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Huang, Jing & Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Ning, Shanshan & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2024. "The decoupling relationship between land use efficiency and carbon emissions in China: An analysis using the Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Roman Plokhikh & Dana Shokparova & Gyula Fodor & Sándor Berghauer & Attila Tóth & Uzakbay Suymukhanov & Aiman Zhakupova & Imre Varga & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Pasture Agrolandscapes: A Landscape-Ecological-Indicative Approach to Environmental Audits and Impact Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Tan, Rong & Xiong, Changsheng & Kimmich, Christian, 2023. "An agent-situation-based model for networked action situations: Cap-and-trade land policies in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Carole Johnson & Stephen P. Osborne, 2003. "Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 147-154, July.
    8. Artur A Steinerowski & Izabella Steinerowska-Streb, 2012. "Can social enterprise contribute to creating sustainable rural communities? Using the lens of structuration theory to analyse the emergence of rural social enterprise," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(2), pages 167-182, March.
    9. Li, Long & Huang, Xianjin & Yang, Hong, 2023. "Optimizing land use patterns to improve the contribution of land use planning to carbon neutrality target," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Karen McArdle, 2011. "What makes a successful rural regeneration partnership? The views of successful partners and the importance of ethos for the community development professional," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 333-345, August.
    11. Ian Cunningham, 2016. "Non-profits and the ‘hollowed out’ state: the transformation of working conditions through personalizing social care services during an era of austerity," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(4), pages 649-668, August.
    12. Parviz Azizi & Ali Soltani & Farokh Bagheri & Shahrzad Sharifi & Mehdi Mikaeili, 2022. "An Integrated Modelling Approach to Urban Growth and Land Use/Cover Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Fang Liu & Erfu Dai & Jun Yin, 2023. "A Review of Social–Ecological System Research and Geographical Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Lijia Zhang & Zhenqi Hu & Dazhi Yang & Huanhuan Li & Bo Liu & He Gao & Congjie Cao & Yan Zhou & Junfang Li & Shuchang Li, 2022. "Land Use Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines in Inner Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Yubo Wang & Xizhu Yang, 2022. "Fiscal Ecological Cost of Land in China: Estimation and Regional Differences," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Qi Yin & Liangzhao Chen & Jinhua Li & Qilong Wang & Xiaowen Dai & Wei Sun & Hong Tang, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Development Goals: Coupling Coordination Analysis and Spatial Heterogeneity between Urbanization, the Environment, and Food Security in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Su, Dan & Cao, Yu & Wang, Jiayi & Fang, Xiaoqian & Wu, Qing, 2023. "Toward constructing an eco-account of cultivated land by quantifying the resources flow and eco-asset transfer in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.