IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v94y2016icp63-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A likelihood-free filtering method via approximate Bayesian computation in evaluating biological simulation models

Author

Listed:
  • Hasegawa, Takanori
  • Niida, Atsushi
  • Mori, Tomoya
  • Shimamura, Teppei
  • Yamaguchi, Rui
  • Miyano, Satoru
  • Akutsu, Tatsuya
  • Imoto, Seiya

Abstract

For the evaluation of the dynamic behavior of biological processes, e.g., gene regulatory sequences, we typically utilize nonlinear differential equations within a state space model in the context of genomic data assimilation. For the estimation of the parameter values for such systems, the particle filter can be a strong approach in terms of obtaining their theoretically exact posterior distributions of the parameter values. However, it has some drawbacks for dealing with biological processes in practice: (i) the number of unique particles decreases rapidly since the dimension of the parameter vector and the number of observed time points are higher than its capability, (ii) it cannot be applied when the likelihood function is analytically intractable, and (iii) the prior distributions of the parameter values are often arbitrary determined. To address these problems, we propose a novel method that utilizes the approximate Bayesian computation in filtering the data and self-organizing ensemble Kalman filter in constructing the prior distributions of the parameter values. Simulation studies show that the proposed method can overcome these problems; thus, it can estimate the posterior distributions of the parameter values with automatically setting prior distributions even for the cases that the particle filter cannot perform good results. Finally, we apply the method to real observation data in rat circadian oscillation and demonstrate the usefulness in practical situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasegawa, Takanori & Niida, Atsushi & Mori, Tomoya & Shimamura, Teppei & Yamaguchi, Rui & Miyano, Satoru & Akutsu, Tatsuya & Imoto, Seiya, 2016. "A likelihood-free filtering method via approximate Bayesian computation in evaluating biological simulation models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 63-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:63-74
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2015.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947315001760
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2015.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. C. Drovandi & A. N. Pettitt, 2011. "Estimation of Parameters for Macroparasite Population Evolution Using Approximate Bayesian Computation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 225-233, March.
    2. Pierre Del Moral & Arnaud Doucet & Ajay Jasra, 2006. "Sequential Monte Carlo samplers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 411-436, June.
    3. Michael B. Elowitz & Stanislas Leibler, 2000. "A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 335-338, January.
    4. Geweke, John & Tanizaki, Hisashi, 2001. "Bayesian estimation of state-space models using the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm within Gibbs sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 151-170, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filippi Sarah & Barnes Chris P. & Stumpf Michael P.H. & Cornebise Julien, 2013. "On optimality of kernels for approximate Bayesian computation using sequential Monte Carlo," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 87-107, March.
    2. Maxime Lenormand & Franck Jabot & Guillaume Deffuant, 2013. "Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation for complex models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2777-2796, December.
    3. Drovandi, Christopher C. & McGree, James M. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2013. "Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian sequentially designed experiments for discrete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 320-335.
    4. Drovandi, Christopher C. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2011. "Likelihood-free Bayesian estimation of multivariate quantile distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2541-2556, September.
    5. Warne, David J. & Baker, Ruth E. & Simpson, Matthew J., 2018. "Multilevel rejection sampling for approximate Bayesian computation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 71-86.
    6. Hai‐Dang Dau & Nicolas Chopin, 2022. "Waste‐free sequential Monte Carlo," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(1), pages 114-148, February.
    7. Jin Wang & Bo Huang & Xuefeng Xia & Zhirong Sun, 2006. "Funneled Landscape Leads to Robustness of Cell Networks: Yeast Cell Cycle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Xing Ju Lee & Christopher C. Drovandi & Anthony N. Pettitt, 2015. "Model choice problems using approximate Bayesian computation with applications to pathogen transmission data sets," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 198-207, March.
    9. Linnea Polgreen & Pedro Silos, 2008. "Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Sensitivity Analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 11(2), pages 302-313, April.
    10. James Martin & Ajay Jasra & Emma McCoy, 2013. "Inference for a class of partially observed point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 413-437, June.
    11. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Bottani, Samuel & Grammaticos, Basile, 2008. "A simple model of genetic oscillations through regulated degradation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1468-1482.
    13. Margherita Carletti & Malay Banerjee, 2019. "A Backward Technique for Demographic Noise in Biological Ordinary Differential Equation Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Lee Anthony & Caron Francois & Doucet Arnaud & Holmes Chris, 2012. "Bayesian Sparsity-Path-Analysis of Genetic Association Signal using Generalized t Priors," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-31, January.
    15. Nguyen, Hoang & Virbickaitė, Audronė, 2023. "Modeling stock-oil co-dependence with Dynamic Stochastic MIDAS Copula models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    16. Konstantinos I Papadimitriou & Guy-Bart V Stan & Emmanuel M Drakakis, 2013. "Systematic Computation of Nonlinear Cellular and Molecular Dynamics with Low-Power CytoMimetic Circuits: A Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Naoki Awaya & Yasuhiro Omori, 2021. "Particle Rolling MCMC with Double-Block Sampling ," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1175, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    18. Inés P Mariño & Alexey Zaikin & Joaquín Míguez, 2017. "A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Zhdanov, Vladimir P., 2012. "Periodic perturbation of genetic oscillations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 577-587.
    20. Xiaohong Chen & Timothy M. Christensen & Elie Tamer, 2018. "Monte Carlo Confidence Sets for Identified Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 1965-2018, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:63-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.