IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000497/016762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gobierno corporativo una aproximación teórica

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Portalanza

Abstract

El devenir del entorno económico y financiero de las últimas décadas ha condicionado en gran parte el modo en que las organizaciones se relacionan con personas y entidades de su entorno. Esto ha dado lugar a la necesidad de que las organizaciones cuenten con sistemas de gobierno corporativo eficaces y eficientes. El propósito de este artículo es documentar la evolución del constructo “gobierno corporativo” con el objetivo de aportar en la estructuración de un marco conceptual que ordene el conocimiento. Se hace una revisión de los antecedentes, conceptos, teorías relacionadas y grupos de interés involucrados. Se concluye que las definiciones del término gobierno corporativo varían desde diferentes puntos de vista, así como las estructuras y procesos dentro de cada organización. De ahí que uno de los principales objetivos del GC sea asegurar y proteger los intereses de todos los stakeholders de una organización.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Portalanza, 2013. "Gobierno corporativo una aproximación teórica," Revista Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, Universidad Libre - Sede Cartagena, vol. 8(1), pages 117-124, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000497:016762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/saber/article/view/1888
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Clarke, 2005. "Accounting for Enron: shareholder value and stakeholder interests," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 598-612, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher, Joe, 2012. "Tension between the corporate and collegial cultures of Australian public universities: The current status," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 556-571.
    2. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Charles T. Crespy & Van V. Miller, 2011. "Sustainability reporting: A comparative study of NGOs and MNCs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 275-284, September.
    4. MuiChing Chan & John Watson & David Woodliff, 2014. "Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 59-73, November.
    5. Sebahattin Demirkan & Harlan Platt, 2009. "Financial status, corporate governance quality, and the likelihood of managers using discretionary accruals," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 93-117, September.
    6. Ayman Mohamed Zerban & Abdullah Mohammed Abdullateef Madani, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Responsibility in Appointing Senior Managers: A Case in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 183-183, December.
    7. Xingqiang Du, 2014. "Does Religion Mitigate Tunneling? Evidence from Chinese Buddhism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 299-327, December.
    8. Hongjin Zhu & Pengji Wang & Chris Bart, 2016. "Board Processes, Board Strategic Involvement, and Organizational Performance in For-profit and Non-profit Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 311-328, June.
    9. Christopher, Joe, 2010. "Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 683-695.
    10. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    11. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Murad Ali & Hossein G. T. Olya & Muhamamd Zulqarnain & Zubair Rashid Khan, 2018. "Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical approaches," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1270-1283, November.
    12. Joe Christopher & Philomena Leung & Shane Leong, 2017. "Can Employees Be Used to Overcome Independent Audit Limitations?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 442-456, December.
    13. Adriano Stadler & Edson Andrade dos Reis & Elaine Cristina Arantes & Jansen Maia Del Corso, 2017. "Study on Professors’ Perception With Respect to Higher Education Institutions’ Socially Responsible Initiatives," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(6), pages 592-608, November.
    14. Linsley, Philip M. & Shrives, Philip J., 2009. "Mary Douglas, risk and accounting failures," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 492-508.
    15. Dorothee Feils & Manzur Rahman & Florin Şabac, 2018. "Corporate Governance Systems Diversity: A Coasian Perspective on Stakeholder Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 451-466, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000497:016762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revista Saber, Ciencia y Libertad (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.