IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/uea/ueaccp/2010_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Market-Share Contracts as Facilitating Practices

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Gabrielsen, Tommy Staahl & Johansen, Bjørn Olav, 2015. "Buyer power and exclusion in vertically related markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-18.
  2. Gabrielsen, Tommy Staahl & Johansen, Bjørn Olav, 2013. "Resale Price Maintenance And Up-Front Payments: Achieving Horizontal Control Under Seller And Buyer Power," Working Papers in Economics 02/13, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
  3. Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer, 2016. "Are Market-Share Contracts a Poor Man’s Exclusive Dealing?," Monash Economics Working Papers 44-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.
  4. Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer, 2015. "Nonlinear pricing and exclusion: I. buyer opportunism," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(2), pages 217-240, June.
  5. Ravi Mantena & Rajib L. Saha, 2022. "Market Share Contracts in B2B Procurement Settings with Heterogeneous User Preferences," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1290-1308, March.
  6. David E. Mills, 2017. "Inducing Cooperation with a Carrot Instead of a Stick," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 50(2), pages 245-261, March.
  7. Calzolari, Giacomo & Denicolò, Vincenzo, 2020. "Loyalty discounts and price-cost tests," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  8. Aaron Edlin & Joseph Farrell, 2011. "Freedom to Trade and the Competitive Process," NBER Working Papers 16818, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Caprice, Stéphane & von Schlippenbach, Vanessa & Wey, Christian, 2014. "Supplier Fixed costs and Retail Market Monopolization," TSE Working Papers 14-524, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
  10. Greer, Katja, 2013. "Limiting rival's efficiency via conditional discounts," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79730, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  11. Katja Greer, 2013. "Limiting rival's efficiency via conditional discounts," Working Papers 132, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
  12. Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer, 2014. "Naked exclusion with minimum-share requirements," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 64-91, March.
  13. Lømo, Teis Lunde & Meland, Frode & Sandvik, Håvard Mork, 2020. "Do slotting allowances reduce product variety?," Working Papers in Economics 7/20, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
  14. Jay Pil Choi & Christodoulos Stefanadis, 2018. "Sequential innovation, naked exclusion, and upfront lump-sum payments," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(4), pages 891-915, June.
  15. Philippe Choné & Laurent Linnemer, 2011. "Leaving the Door Ajar : Nonlinear Pricing by a Dominant Firm," Working Papers 2011-16, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  16. Navid Mojir & K. Sudhir, 2021. "A Structural Model of Organizational Buying for B2B Markets: Innovation Adoption with Share of Wallet Contracts," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2315, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  17. Bakó, Barna & Kálecz-Simon, András, 2012. "Vertikális korlátozások - növelik vagy csökkentik a jólétet?. Érvek az irodalomból [Vertical constraints - do they increase or reduce welfare?. Arguments in the literature]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1138-1159.
  18. Johannes Paha, 2017. "Wholesale Pricing with Incomplete Information about Private Label Products," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201736, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
  19. Edlin, Aaron & Farrell, Joseph, 2011. "Freedom to Trade and the Competitive Process," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0xg2h885, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
  20. Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer, 2019. "Market Share Contracts, Exclusive Dealing, and the Integer Problem," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 208-242, February.
  21. Ugur Akgun & Ioana Chioveanu, 2012. "Loyalty Discounts," CEDI Discussion Paper Series 12-07, Centre for Economic Development and Institutions(CEDI), Brunel University.
  22. Yong Chao & Guofu Tan & Adam Chi Leung Wong, 2018. "All†units discounts as a partial foreclosure device," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 49(1), pages 155-180, March.
  23. Calzolari, Giacomo & Denicolo, Vincenzo, 2020. "Exploiting rivals' strengths," CEPR Discussion Papers 15520, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  24. Edlin, Aaron & Jennings, Richard & Farrell, Joseph, 2011. "Freedom to Trade and the Competitive Process," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5gx9n3tf, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
  25. Cong Pan, 2016. "Retailer’s product line choice with manufacturer’s multichannel marketing," ISER Discussion Paper 0976, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
  26. Ordover, Janusz A. & Shaffer, Greg, 2013. "Exclusionary discounts," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 569-586.
  27. Henrik Vetter, 2017. "Pricing and market conduct in a vertical relationship," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 239-253, July.
  28. Edlin, Aaron & Farrell, Joseph, 2011. "Freedom to Trade and the Competitive Process," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt6r51d3zg, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.