IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pro1304.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Jonathan Rogers

Personal Details

First Name:Jonathan
Middle Name:
Last Name:Rogers
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pro1304
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/rogerspoliticalscience/Home

Affiliation

Economics
New York University Abu Dhabi

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
https://nyuad.nyu.edu/en/academics/divisions/social-science.html
RePEc:edi:ecnyuae (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Demirović, Melisa & Rogers, Jonathan & Robbins, Blaine G, 2022. "Gender and Gender Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from an Online Experiment," SocArXiv 7esb9, Center for Open Science.
  2. Breznau, Nate & Rinke, Eike Mark & Wuttke, Alexander & Adem, Muna & Adriaans, Jule & Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia & Andersen, Henrik Kenneth & Auer, Daniel & Azevedo, Flavio & Bahnsen, Oke, 2021. "Observing Many Researchers using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Data Analysis," MetaArXiv cd5j9, Center for Open Science.
  3. David Johnson & Sebastian Goerg & Jonathan Rogers, "undated". "Can't Touch This! Similarity And Willingness to Keep "Dirty Money"," Working Papers 2014-81, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 10 Nov 2014.

Articles

  1. Rogers, Jonathan & Tyszler, Marcelo, 2018. "Information and Economic Voting," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 753-770, October.
  2. Rogers, Jonathan, 2017. "Nothing to Lose: Charitable Donations as Incentives in Risk Preference Measurement," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 34-56, April.
  3. Sebastian J. Goerg & David B. Johnson & Jonathan D. Rogers, 2017. "Endowments, Perceived Similarity, And Dictator Giving," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 1130-1144, April.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Breznau, Nate & Rinke, Eike Mark & Wuttke, Alexander & Adem, Muna & Adriaans, Jule & Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia & Andersen, Henrik Kenneth & Auer, Daniel & Azevedo, Flavio & Bahnsen, Oke, 2021. "Observing Many Researchers using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Data Analysis," MetaArXiv cd5j9, Center for Open Science.

    Cited by:

    1. Goldman, Daniel S, 2021. "A Reply to Breznau, Rinke, and Wuttke on the Discordant Outcomes of Hypothesis Testing," MetaArXiv qs5gm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Ruohuang Jiao & Wojtek Przepiorka & Vincent Buskens, 2022. "Moderators of reputation effects in peer-to-peer online markets: a meta-analytic model selection approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1041-1067, May.

Articles

  1. Rogers, Jonathan, 2017. "Nothing to Lose: Charitable Donations as Incentives in Risk Preference Measurement," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 34-56, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Gauriot, Romain & Heger, Stephanie A. & Slonim, Robert, 2020. "Altruism or diminishing marginal utility?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 24-48.
    2. Sharan Grewal & Matthew D. Cebul, 2023. "Can Religious Reinterpretations Bridge the Secular-Religious Divide? Experimental Evidence from Tunisia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(2-3), pages 428-456, February.

  2. Sebastian J. Goerg & David B. Johnson & Jonathan D. Rogers, 2017. "Endowments, Perceived Similarity, And Dictator Giving," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 1130-1144, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Becker, Johannes & Hopp, Daniel & Kriebel, Michael, 2020. "Mental accounting of public funds – The flypaper effect in the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 321-336.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (3) 2014-04-05 2014-12-08 2022-04-18. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2014-04-05 2014-12-08. Author is listed
  3. NEP-GEN: Gender (1) 2022-04-18. Author is listed
  4. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2021-04-05. Author is listed
  5. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (1) 2014-04-05. Author is listed
  6. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2022-04-18. Author is listed

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jonathan Rogers should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.