IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pde1034.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Willem de Boer

Personal Details

First Name:Willem
Middle Name:
Last Name:de Boer
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pde1034
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

Groningen, Netherlands
http://www.rug.nl/feb/
RePEc:edi:ferugnl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Mary O’Mahony & Willem de Boer, 2002. "Britain’s Relative Productivity Performance: Has Anything Changed?," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 179(1), pages 38-43, January.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Mary O’Mahony & Willem de Boer, 2002. "Britain’s Relative Productivity Performance: Has Anything Changed?," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 179(1), pages 38-43, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Draca, Mirko & Sadun, Raffaella & Van Reenen, John, 2006. "Productivity and ICT: A Review of the Evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4561, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Nicholas Oulton & Sylaja Srinivasan, 2005. "Productivity Growth and the Role of ICT in the United Kingdom: An Industry View, 1970-2000," CEP Discussion Papers dp0681, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Michael Ball, 2007. "Firm Size and Competition: A Comparison of the Housebuilding Industries in Australia, the UK and the USA," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2007-02, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    4. Paul Schreyer, 2007. "International Comparisons of Levels of Capital Input and Multi‐Factor Productivity," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(2), pages 237-254, May.
    5. Ralf Martin, 2010. "Why is the USA so energy intensive? Evidence from US multinationals in the UK," GRI Working Papers 15, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    6. Kostakis, Ioannis & Lolos, Sarantis & Doulgeraki, Charikleia, 2020. "Cultural Heritage led Growth: Regional evidence from Greece (1998-2016)," MPRA Paper 98443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Harry X. WU & David T. LIANG, 2017. "Accounting for the Role of Information and Communication Technology in China's Productivity Growth," Discussion papers 17111, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Broadberry, Stephen & Crafts, Nicholas, 2010. "Openness, Protectionism And Britain’S Productivity Performance Over The Long-Run," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 36, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    9. Mauro Giorgio Marrano & Jonathan Haskel & Gavin Wallis, 2009. "What Happened To The Knowledge Economy? Ict, Intangible Investment, And Britain'S Productivity Record Revisited," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(3), pages 686-716, September.
    10. Nicholas Oulton & Sylaja Srinivasan, 2005. "Productivity growth in UK industries, 1970-2000: structural change and the role of ICT," Bank of England working papers 259, Bank of England.
    11. Bernd Görzig & Martin Gornig & Laurence Nayman, 2012. "Productivity Transitions in Large Mature Economies: France, Germany and the UK," Chapters, in: Matilde Mas & Robert Stehrer (ed.), Industrial Productivity in Europe, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Willem de Boer should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.