IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/ppr167.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Annalisa Primi

Personal Details

First Name:Annalisa
Middle Name:
Last Name:Primi
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppr167

Affiliation

Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE)

Paris, France
http://www.oecd.org/gov/
RePEc:edi:teoecfr (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers

Working papers

  1. Rainer Kattel & Annalisa Primi, 2010. "The periphery paradox in innovation policy: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 29, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
  2. Mario Cimoli & Annalisa Primi, 2008. "Technology and intellectual property: a taxonomy of contemporary markets for knowledge and their implications for development," LEM Papers Series 2008/06, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
  3. Mario Cimoli & Marcio Holland & Gabriel Porcile & Annalisa Primi & Sebastià n Vergara, 2006. "Growth, Structural Change and Technological Capabilities. Latin America in a Comparative Perspective," LEM Papers Series 2006/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Rainer Kattel & Annalisa Primi, 2010. "The periphery paradox in innovation policy: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 29, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    Cited by:

    1. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Jaax, Alexander, 2017. "Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66948, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & Viktor Prokop, 2020. "Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries—A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.

  2. Mario Cimoli & Annalisa Primi, 2008. "Technology and intellectual property: a taxonomy of contemporary markets for knowledge and their implications for development," LEM Papers Series 2008/06, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    Cited by:

    1. Pluvia Zuniga, 2011. "The State of Patenting at Research Institutions in Developing Countries: Policy Approaches and Practices," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 04, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, revised Dec 2011.
    2. F. Montobbio & A. Primi & Valerio Sterzi, 2015. "IPRs and international knowledge flows: Evidence from six large emerging countries," Post-Print hal-02486325, HAL.

  3. Mario Cimoli & Marcio Holland & Gabriel Porcile & Annalisa Primi & Sebastià n Vergara, 2006. "Growth, Structural Change and Technological Capabilities. Latin America in a Comparative Perspective," LEM Papers Series 2006/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    Cited by:

    1. F. Montobbio & Valerio Sterzi, 2014. "International patenting and knowledge flows in Latin America," Post-Print hal-02486323, HAL.
    2. Enrico Alessandri, 2021. "Innovation and trade patterns in the Latin American mining sector," Working Papers 2103, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2021.
    3. Fabio Montobbio & Valerio Sterzi, 2008. "Inventing Together: Exploring the Nature of International Knowledge Spillovers in Latin America," KITeS Working Papers 225, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Nov 2008.
    4. Mario Cimoli & Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson & Joseph Stiglitz, 2007. "Policies and Institutional Engineering in Developing Economies," Globelics Working Paper Series 2007-04, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    5. Rainer Kattel & Annalisa Primi, 2010. "The periphery paradox in innovation policy: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 29, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    6. L Carlos Freire-Gibb & Geoff Gregson, 2019. "Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(8), pages 787-806, December.
    7. Fernández, Sara & Torrecillas, Celia & Labra, Romilio Ernesto, 2021. "Drivers of eco-innovation in developing countries: the case of Chilean firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Naude, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2015. "Industrialisation, Innovation, Inclusion," MERIT Working Papers 2015-043, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Amaghouss, Jabrane & Ibourk, Aomar, 2019. "Higher Education and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of World Regions Trajectories," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 72(3), pages 321-350.
    10. Jorge E, Mendoza, 2007. "Apertura. Gasto Público Y Convergencia En América Latin: Un Modelo Econometrico Espacial [Liberalization, Public Spending And Convergence In Latin America: An Spatial Econometric Model]," MPRA Paper 5561, University Library of Munich, Germany.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-INO: Innovation (3) 2006-05-13 2008-04-15 2010-04-04
  2. NEP-KNM: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy (3) 2008-04-15 2010-04-04 2010-07-03
  3. NEP-IPR: Intellectual Property Rights (1) 2008-04-15
  4. NEP-LAM: Central and South America (1) 2010-04-04
  5. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2010-04-04
  6. NEP-TRA: Transition Economics (1) 2010-04-04

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Annalisa Primi should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.