IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uterxx/v46y2023i1p68-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Everybody Should Know about Radicalization and the DRIA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Orsini

Abstract

Thousands of monographs, reports, and articles about radicalization have been published since 2001. With the passage of time, the “scientific community” has come to identify some of them as “milestones.” Which are they? Unlike Anja Dalgaard-Nielsen, who wrote an article in 2010 on what we know and what we don’t know about violent radicalization in Europe, the author here aims to present and discuss what everybody should know about the process of becoming radicalized. This article has four aims. The first is to present and discuss the most influential theories of radicalization leading to terrorism. This author attributes the milestones in radicalization research to the following scholars: Fathali M. Moghaddam, Silber & Bhatt, Marc Sageman, John Horgan, Quintan Wiktorowicz, Lawrence Kuznar, Clark McCauley, Sophia Moskalenko, Donatella della Porta, Arie W. Kruglanski, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, and Rohan Gunaratna. The second aim is to highlight the contribution of sociology, as an academic discipline, to the study of radicalization. To that end, the process of radicalization has been conceptualized here as a process of socialization or, more precisely, resocialization. The third aim is to present the DRIA Model of radicalization that is based on the lives of thirty-nine jihadi terrorists who succeeded in carrying out terror attacks in the West between 2004 and 2018. The fourth aim is to contribute to the debate over the “stagnation” – real or presumed – in radicalization research.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:46:y:2023:i:1:p:68-100
DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738669
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738669
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738669?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:46:y:2023:i:1:p:68-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uter20 .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.