IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uterxx/v43y2020i11p959-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attack at Fort Hood: Experiences and Suggestions for Security

Author

Listed:
  • William Moravits

Abstract

In the past nine years, three lone wolf terrorists have targeted military bases or recruiting centers in the United States and research suggests attacks on the U.S. military are increasing globally. The problem was that research had not addressed the lived experiences of survivors of lone wolf attacks, nor how they could inform procedures regarding a sense of security for military men and women. The purpose of this research was to establish a need to address threats to the security of the military from these attacks, to provide a rich description of survivors’ experiences of the attack at Fort Hood, and to identify suggestions for improving military personnel’s sense of security while on base. Using the community-based approach to public health. the central research question asked how the lived experiences of survivors of the attack at Fort Hood could lead to an increased sense of security on base. The study revealed high levels of stress, hyperawareness, and negative changes in the lives of these soldiers. The findings suggest an increased show of force by police throughout the base, a designated office for anonymously reporting suspicious activity, and more training to help soldiers cope with the experiences of combat-related trauma.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:43:y:2020:i:11:p:959-988
DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1514079
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1514079
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1514079?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:43:y:2020:i:11:p:959-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uter20 .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.