IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uterxx/v42y2019i8p771-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End of the Lone Wolf: The Typology that Should Not Have Been

Author

Listed:
  • Bart Schuurman
  • Lasse Lindekilde
  • Stefan Malthaner
  • Francis O'Connor
  • Paul Gill
  • Noémie Bouhana

Abstract

This research note argues that the “lone wolf” typology should be fundamentally reconsidered. Based on a three-year empirical research project, two key points are made to support this argument. First, the authors found that ties to online and offline radical milieus are critical to lone actors' adoption and maintenance of both the motive and capability to commit acts of terrorism. Second, in terms of pre-attack behaviors, the majority of lone actors are not the stealthy and highly capable terrorists the “lone wolf” moniker alludes to. These findings not only urge a reconsideration of the utility of the lone-wolf concept, they are also particularly relevant for counterterrorism professionals, whose conceptions of this threat may have closed off avenues for detection and interdiction that do, in fact, exist.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:42:y:2019:i:8:p:771-778
DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1419554
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1419554
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1419554?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:42:y:2019:i:8:p:771-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uter20 .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.