IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GARCH-type volatility models based on Brownian inverse Gaussian intra-day return processes

Author

Listed:
  • J. H. Venter, P. J. de Jongh, G. Griebenow

Abstract

ABSTRACT GARCH models are useful to estimate daily volatility in financial return series. When intra-day return data are available realized volatility may be used for the same purpose. We formulate a new model that is a hybrid between a traditional GARCH model and a stochastic volatility model. This model postulates that over each trading day anew the intra-day return process follows a Brownian motion with drift and volatility that are inherited from the previous day in typical GARCH fashion but are also subject to random inverse Gaussian (IG) distributed news noise impacts that arrive after market closure on the previous day. We call it the BIG–GARCH model and derive the likelihood function needed to fit it. It turns out that this uses the daily returns and realized volatilities as sufficient statistics. To make this possible we introduce a number of new distributions related to the IG-distribution and also derive diagnostics that may be used to check the quality of fit. The new model produces two volatility measures, called the expected volatility and the actual volatility. We show that the latter is close to the realized volatility. The model is illustrated by fitting it to IBM daily and intra-day returns.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161048
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4841/jor_v8n4a4.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.