IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7955302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imbalanced data issues in machine learning classifiers: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Mingxing Gong

Abstract

Machine learning classifiers are widely used in financial applications. Due to the nature of certain classification problems, special care should be taken when dealing with imbalanced data. In practice, many model developers and validators fail to take this into account in their model development and validation. In addition, resampling is a common technique to address imbalanced data issues when building traditional logistic regression models. However, there has been no specific discussion regarding the resampling ratio used to rebalance the data or how the issue of imbalance impacts different kinds of machine learning classifiers, especially the more advanced ones. This paper aims to outline the special characteristics of the classifiers, compare different methods in dealing with imbalanced data issues and provide best practice in model development, evaluation and validation to avoid common pitfalls. Although the methods discussed in this paper can apply to general machine learning classifiers in applications with imbalanced data issues, by using a case study in credit card fraud detection this paper calls practitioners’ attention to the imbalanced data problems therein, where class imbalance is often mistreated and lacks theoretical discussion.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7955302
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-01/jop_gong_web_final_v2.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7955302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.