IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/68.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Normentwicklung durch WTO-Gremien am Beispiel von Handel und Gesundheitsschutz: der SPS-Ausschuss

Author

Listed:
  • Maier, Matthias Leonhard

Abstract

Das Papier ist einem bisher wenig beachteten Aspekt des globalen Regierens gewidmet, nämlich dem Ausschusssystem der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO) und insbesondere jenem Ausschuss, der dem Abkommen über gesundheitspolizeiliche und pflanzenschutzrechtliche Maßnahmen (SPS-Abkommen) zugeordnet ist. Zuerst werden der historische und politische Hintergrund sowie die wichtigsten Bestimmungen des SPS-Abkommens kurz erläutert und es wird erklärt, wie der SPS-Ausschuss seine Arbeit organisiert. Im Hauptteil werden vier konkrete Bestimmungen des Abkommens daraufhin untersucht, wie der Ausschuss ihren Inhalt mit seinen Entscheidungen konkretisiert hat. Dabei geht es um (1) das Monitoring der internationalen Harmonisierung durch standardsetzende Organisationen wie die Codex-Alimentarius-Kommission, (2) die Anerkennung der Gleichwertigkeit lebensmittelrechtlicher Schutzmaßnahmen zwischen WTO-Mitgliedstaaten, (3) die Forderung nach Konsistenz zwischen verschiedenen SPS-Maßnahmen eines Mitgliedes und (4) die Transparenz innerstaatlicher Standards und Regulierungsverfahren. Anschließend werden die Wirkungen dieser Entscheidungen diskutiert, und zwar sowohl in formaler Hinsicht hier erweist sich der Ausschuss als bemerkenswert produktiv als auch hinsichtlich zweier Kernprobleme von regulatorischen Mehrebenensystemen: (1) Was die Wirkung von internationalem Recht auf nationalstaatliche politische Autonomie betrifft, hat der Ausschuss die prekäre Balance von erlaubten Schutzmaßnahmen und untersagtem Protektionismus im wesentlichen beibehalten, auch wenn einige der von ihm beschlossenen prozeduralen Regelungen geeignet sind, die staatliche Autonomie längerfristig weiter einzuschränken. (2) Was die Gewaltenteilung zwischen judiziellen und politisch-administrativen Organen der WTO betrifft, hat der Ausschuss bisher die in ihn gesetzten Hoffnungen auf eine Wiederherstellung des institutionellen Gleichgewichts nicht erfüllt. Die Studie schließt mit einigen Empfehlungen für die weitere Erforschung dieser Fragen.

Suggested Citation

  • Maier, Matthias Leonhard, 2007. "Normentwicklung durch WTO-Gremien am Beispiel von Handel und Gesundheitsschutz: der SPS-Ausschuss," TranState Working Papers 68, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24981/1/583993206.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, 2002. "Tensions between the dispute settlement process and the diplomatic and treaty-making activities of the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 301-308, November.
    2. Wolfe, Robert, 2003. "Regulatory transparency, developing countries and the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 157-182, July.
    3. Roberts, Donna, 1998. "Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Regulations," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 377-405, September.
    4. Claude Barfield, 2001. "Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 52877, September.
    5. repec:aei:rpbook:24252 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Timothy E. Josling & Donna Roberts & David Orden, 2004. "Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 347, July.
    7. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, 2000. "Hard and Soft Law in International Governance," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 421-456, July.
    8. Pauwelyn, Joost, 1999. "The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes: EC--Hormones, Australia--Salmon and Japan--Varietals," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 641-664, December.
    9. Kerr, William A., 2003. "Science-based Rules of Trade: A Mantra for Some, An Anathema for Others," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 4(2), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inaba, Masaru & Nutahara, Kengo, 2009. "The role of investment wedges in the Carlstrom-Fuerst economy and business cycle accounting," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 200-203, December.
    2. JINJI Naoto, 2009. "An Economic Theory of the SPS Agreement," Discussion papers 09033, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. John C. Beghin & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, 2017. "Nontariff Measures and Standards in Trade and Global Value Chains," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 2, pages 13-38, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Heinz Hauser & Alexander Roitinger, 2002. "A Renegotiation Perspective on Transatlantic Trade Disputes," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2002 2002-09, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    6. Gerstetter, Christiane & Maier, Matthias Leonhard, 2005. "Risk regulation, trade and international law: debating the precautionary principle in and around the WTO," TranState Working Papers 18, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    7. William A. Kerr, 2010. "What is New in Protectionism? Consumers, Cranks, and Captives," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 58(1), pages 5-22, March.
    8. Christophe Charlier & Michel Rainelli, 2002. "Hormones, Risk Management, Precaution and Protectionism: An Analysis of the Dispute on Hormone-Treated Beef between the European Union and the United States," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 83-97, September.
    9. Prema‐Chandra Athukorala & Sisira Jayasuriya, 2003. "Food Safety Issues, Trade and WTO Rules: A Developing Country Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 1395-1416, September.
    10. Diahanna L. Post, 2005. "Standards and Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Food Safety Standards in Developing Countries," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 168-183, March.
    11. Phulkerd, Sirinya & Sacks, Gary & Vandevijvere, Stefanie & Worsley, Anthony & Lawrence, Mark, 2017. "Barriers and potential facilitators to the implementation of government policies on front-of-pack food labeling and restriction of unhealthy food advertising in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 101-110.
    12. Qiuxia Yang, 2020. "Fiscal Transparency and Public Service Quality Association: Evidence from 12 Coastal Provinces and Cities of China," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Plotnikova, Evgeniya Vadimovna, 2012. "Cross-border mobility of health professionals: Contesting patients’ right to health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 20-27.
    14. David G. Victor, 2016. "What the Framework Convention on Climate Change Teaches Us About Cooperation on Climate Change," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 133-141.
    15. Unnevehr, Laurian J., 2000. "Food safety issues and fresh food product exports from LDCs," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 231-240, September.
    16. Douglas Crawford‐Brown & Joost Pauwelyn & Kelly Smith, 2004. "Environmental Risk, Precaution, and Scientific Rationality in the Context of WTO/NAFTA Trade Rules," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 461-469, April.
    17. Rana, Arslan Tariq & Kebewar, Mazen, 2014. "The Political Economy of FDI flows into Developing Countries: Does the depth of International Trade Agreements Matter?," EconStor Preprints 91501, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Jillienne Haglund, 2016. "Leslie Johns. 2015. Strengthening international courts: The hidden costs of legalization. (Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 151-154, March.
    19. Dixit, Praveen M. & Josling, Timothy E. & Blandford, David, 2001. "The Current Wto Agricultural Negotiations: Options For Progress; Synthesis," Commissioned Papers 14623, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Bo Xiong & John Beghin, 2017. "Disentangling Demand-Enhancing And Trade-Cost Effects Of Maximum Residue Regulations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 6, pages 105-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.