IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/p0042.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In the shadow of the vote? Decisionmaking efficiency in the European Community 1974 - 1995

Author

Listed:
  • Golub, Jonathan

Abstract

The 1987 Single European Act (SEA) is frequently identified as a momentous landmark for European integration because it altered voting procedures in the Council of Ministers - substituting widespread qualified majority voting for the unanimity which had prevailed since the famous Luxembourg Compromise of 1966. Accordingly, nearly all accounts portray the 1970s as a time of enormous inefficiency and legislative stagnation, and hail the post-SEA period as one of expedited decisionmaking and an unblocking of proposals which had languished for years in the Council.However, despite widespread speculation about the significance of the SEA, only impressionistic accounts exist of post-SEA decisionmaking. This paper represents the first systematic effort to assess efficiency both prior to and after the institutional reforms of 1987. Based on comprehensive data for EC Directives proposed since 1974, the paper calculates legislative volume and decisionmaking speed over a twenty-two year period, and employs a multiple regression analysis to identify the determinants of efficiency over time and across policy sectors. The findings challenge several fundamental assumptions in the literature, revealing that in the 1970s decisionmaking efficiency was much higher than is often assumed, that the effects of the Luxembourg Compromise have been exaggerated, and that efficiency gains attributable to extending the shadow of the vote in 1987 have for the most part failed to materialise.

Suggested Citation

  • Golub, Jonathan, 1997. "In the shadow of the vote? Decisionmaking efficiency in the European Community 1974 - 1995," MPIfG Discussion Paper 97/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43183/1/240376447.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.