IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fomarb/50.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Systemisches Risiko und systemrelevante Finanzinstitute

Author

Listed:
  • Nastansky, Andreas

Abstract

[Vorwort] Bis zur globalen Finanzkrise wurde die Bedeutung des systemischen Risikos im Finanzsektor unterschätzt. In weiteren Verlauf wurde sichtbar, dass Risiken von Instituten, die auf der Ebene einer einzelnen Bank als nicht erkennbar bzw. beherrschbar galten, sich bei der Aggregation der Einzelrisiken gegenseitig verstärkten und auf andere Finanzmarkteilnehmer übergriffen. Daher stellt die Identifikation und Regulierung systemrelevanter Finanzinstitute eine essentielle Aufgabe speziell der makroprudenziellen Politik dar. In den zurückliegenden Jahren wurden deutliche Fortschritte bei der Entwicklung von Identifikationsmethoden und Mechanismen zur Abwicklung systemisch relevanter Finanzinstitute sowie der robusteren Gestaltung der Finanzmarktinfrastruktur erzielt. Als Lehre aus der Finanzkrise muss der Schluss gezogen werden, dass Finanzmarktstabilität nur gesichert werden kann, wenn das Finanzsystem als Ganzes betrachtet wird. So werden im vorliegenden Beitrag zur Einordnung in die Thematik zunächst zentrale Risikoarten und Determinanten diskutiert, um darauf aufbauend relevante Instrumente zur Finanzmarktregulierung vorzustellen und die Folgen staatlicher Interventionen in die Diskussion mit einzubeziehen. Dabei werden bisher entwickelte Messansätze zur Systemrelevanz vorgestellt und kritisch diskutiert, bevor auf Basis dieser Verfahren und Modelle systemrelevante nationale und globale Finanzintermediäre identifiziert und anhand von Indikatoren und Gewichtungen bewertet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Nastansky, Andreas, 2014. "Systemisches Risiko und systemrelevante Finanzinstitute," Arbeitspapiere der FOM 50, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Hellwig, 2009. "Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector: An Analysis of the Subprime-Mortgage Financial Crisis," De Economist, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 129-207, June.
    2. Nikola Tarashev & Claudio Borio & Kostas Tsatsaronis, 2010. "Attributing systemic risk to individual institutions," BIS Working Papers 308, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Hannes Rehm, 2011. "Reformen der nationalen und internationalen Finanzarchitektur," Credit and Capital Markets, Credit and Capital Markets, vol. 44(3), pages 317-338.
    4. Christian Weistroffer, 2011. "Identifying Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs)," Working Papers id:4383, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Nastansky & Sarah Siris, 2024. "Risikoverbund zwischen Banken und Staaten: Eine empirische Analyse für den Euroraum," Statistische Diskussionsbeiträge 56, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Borio, 2011. "Rediscovering the Macroeconomic Roots of Financial Stability Policy: Journey, Challenges, and a Way Forward," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 87-117, December.
    2. Lu, Jing & Hu, Xiaohong, 2014. "Novel three-bank model for measuring the systemic importance of commercial banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 238-246.
    3. Zlatuse Komarkova & Vaclav Hausenblas & Jan Frait, 2012. "How To Identify Systemically Important Financial Institutions," Occasional Publications - Chapters in Edited Volumes, in: CNB Financial Stability Report 2011/2012, chapter 0, pages 100-111, Czech National Bank.
    4. Raffestin, Louis, 2014. "Diversification and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 85-106.
    5. Michal Skorepa & Jakub Seidler, 2015. "Capital buffers based on banks’ domestic systemic importance: selected issues," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 207-220, August.
    6. van de Leur, Michiel C.W. & Lucas, André & Seeger, Norman J., 2017. "Network, market, and book-based systemic risk rankings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-90.
    7. Feldmann, Horst, 2012. "Banking deregulation around the world, 1970s to 2000s: The impact on unemployment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 26-42.
    8. Vaneet Bhatia & Sankarshan Basu & Subrata Kumar Mitra & Pradyumna Dash, 2018. "A review of bank efficiency and productivity," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 557-600, November.
    9. Markus Behn & Rainer Haselmann & Paul Wachtel, 2016. "Procyclical Capital Regulation and Lending," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(2), pages 919-956, April.
    10. Jobst, Andreas A., 2014. "Measuring systemic risk-adjusted liquidity (SRL)—A model approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 270-287.
    11. Elsas, Ralf & Hackethal, Andreas & Holzhäuser, Markus, 2010. "The anatomy of bank diversification," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1274-1287, June.
    12. Bennani, T. & Després, M. & Dujardin, M. & Duprey, T. & Kelber, A., 2014. "Macroprudential framework:key questions applied to the French case," Occasional papers 9, Banque de France.
    13. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "Contagion in Financial Networks: A Threat Index," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 955-970, February.
    14. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2015. "A vine-copula conditional value-at-risk approach to systemic sovereign debt risk for the financial sector," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 98-123.
    15. Hans Gersbach & Volker Hahn, 2009. "Banking-on-the-Average Rules," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 09/107, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    16. Dan Costin NIŢESCU & Florin Alexandru DUNĂ & Adriana Daniela CIUREL, 2020. "Banking sector and bank liquidity – key actors within financial crises?," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(623), S), pages 147-168, Summer.
    17. Yudistira Permana & Saiqa Akbar & Anisa Nurpita, 2022. "Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 631-651, December.
    18. Ebrahimi Kahou, Mahdi & Lehar, Alfred, 2017. "Macroprudential policy: A review," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-105.
    19. Moore, Kyle & Zhou, Chen, 2014. "The determinants of systemic importance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59289, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Martin Eling & David Antonius Pankoke, 2016. "Systemic Risk in the Insurance Sector: A Review and Directions for Future Research," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 249-284, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.