IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa15p146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investing in lagging regions is efficient: a local multipliers analysis of U.S. cities

Author

Listed:
  • Jasper van Dijk

Abstract

This paper illustrates the effect of employment in the tradable sector on employment in the non-tradable sector in the same city with a simple model. The model predicts a significant positive local employment multiplier that increases in size with the unemployment rate. It also predicts that the share of newly created jobs fulfilled by current inhabitants of a city increases with the unemployment rate. I test this model with data from the United States census between 1980 and 2000. I estimate that an additional 100 jobs in the tradable sector will increase employment in the non-tradable sector in the same city by employing an additional 81 current residents and 28 workers that move from other regions. I find that in a city with 3.7% unemployment the average local employment multiplier is 0.91 for current inhabitants and 0.60 for migrants. And in a city with 8.4% unemployment the average local employment multiplier is 1.82 for current inhabitants and 0.23 for migrants. These estimates are all consistent with the model and quantify the size of the effect. Finally a nonparametric estimation of the effect of the unemployment rate on the size of the local employment multiplier shows a neat fit to the functional form predicted by the model for both the increasing trend for current inhabitants and the decreasing trend for migrants. Governments can efficiently promote economic growth in cities by providing tax benefits to firms in the tradable sector that locate new plants or expand existing plants in cities with a high unemployment rate. This will increase growth of the tradable sector in cities with a high unemployment rate, which maximizes the positive impact of tradable sector growth on employment in the non-tradable sector. This can be a successful policy to stimulate growth in low growth regions, because cities in these regions tend to have higher unemployment rates. Governments already know that attracting tradable firm can benefit the local economy, for example: U.S. counties give tax cuts to attract tradable firms. Greenstone and Moretti [NBER (2003)] show this is not efficient and could result into all the rents being accrued by the firm, because counties bid against each other. The only gain for the winning county is based on private information, resulting in the firm going to the county that would benefit the most. The efficiency of attracting tradable firms can be increased if a more central government knows which regions would benefit the most from attracting tradable firms and would regulate the tax cuts offered based on this. As a result more benefits would go to the regions instead of the firms. The results from this paper could provide governments with the information needed to achieve this.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasper van Dijk, 2015. "Investing in lagging regions is efficient: a local multipliers analysis of U.S. cities," ERSA conference papers ersa15p146, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa15p146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa15/e150825aFinal00146.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Moretti, 2010. "Local Multipliers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 373-377, May.
    2. Faggio, Giulia & Overman, Henry, 2014. "The effect of public sector employment on local labour markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 91-107.
    3. Moene, Karl Ove, 1988. "A reformulation of the Harris-Todaro mechanism with endogenous wages," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 387-390.
    4. Enrico Moretti & Per Thulin, 2013. "Local multipliers and human capital in the United States and Sweden," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(1), pages 339-362, February.
    5. Timothy J. Bartik, 1991. "Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number wbsle, November.
    6. Jasper van Dijk, 2014. "Local Employment Multipliers in U.S. cities," Economics Series Working Papers 730, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    7. Michael Greenstone & Richard Hornbeck & Enrico Moretti, 2008. "Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Million Dollar Plants," Working Paper series 36_08, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    8. Michael Greenstone & Enrico Moretti, 2003. "Bidding for Industrial Plants: Does Winning a 'Million Dollar Plant' Increase Welfare?," NBER Working Papers 9844, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Shapiro, Carl & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1984. "Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(3), pages 433-444, June.
    10. repec:rim:rimwps:36-08 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Harris, John R & Todaro, Michael P, 1970. "Migration, Unemployment & Development: A Two-Sector Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(1), pages 126-142, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasper van Dijk, 2016. "Investing In Lagging Regions Is Efficient: A Local Multipliers Analysis Of U.S. Cities," Economics Series Working Papers 776, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Jasper Van Dijk, 2014. "Local Multipliers, Unemployment and Migration: An Empirical Analysis of the United States," ERSA conference papers ersa14p504, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Jasper Van Dijk, 2014. "Determinants of Local Multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa14p57, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Roberta Moraes Rocha & Breno Caldas Araújo, 2021. "Local multiplier effect of the tradable sector on the Brazilian labor market," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 269-286, December.
    5. Kemeny, Tom & Osman, Taner, 2018. "The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from U.S. cities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1729-1740.
    6. Kemeny, Thomas & Osman, Taner, 2017. "The wider impacts of high-technology employment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101854, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Dioni Elche & Davide Consoli & Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo, 2021. "From brawn to brains: manufacturing–KIBS interdependency," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1282-1298, July.
    8. Marta Auricchio, 2015. "Local Manufacturing Multiplier, Technology Level and Human Capital in Italian Local Labor Markets," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1381, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Lee, Neil & Clarke, Stephen, 2019. "Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    10. Ting Wang & Areendam Chanda, 2016. "Manufacturing Growth and Local Multipliers in China," Departmental Working Papers 2016-02, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    11. Jofre-Monseny, Jordi & Silva, José I. & Vázquez-Grenno, Javier, 2020. "Local labor market effects of public employment," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Augusto Cerqua & Guido Pellegrini, 2020. "Local multipliers at work," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 959-977.
    13. Jasper van Dijk, 2014. "Local Employment Multipliers in U.S. cities," Economics Series Working Papers 730, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Joseph Persky & Daniel Felsenstein, 2008. "Job Chains And Wage Curves: Worker Mobility And Marshallian Surpluses In Evaluating Regional Employment Growth," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 921-940, December.
    15. Jasper van Dijk, 2015. "Local Multipliers In United States Cities: A Replication of Moretti (2010)," Economics Series Working Papers 771, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    16. Taner Osman & Tom Kemeny, 2022. "Local job multipliers revisited," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 150-170, January.
    17. Charlotte Senftleben-König, "undated". "Public Sector Employment and Local Multipliers," BDPEMS Working Papers 2014010, Berlin School of Economics.
    18. Lee, Jongkwan, 2021. "The Role of a University in Cluster Formation: Evidence from a National Institute of Science and Technology in Korea," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato & Owen Zidar, 2016. "Who Benefits from State Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2582-2624, September.
    20. Gagliardi, Luisa, 2019. "The impact of foreign technological innovation on domestic employment via the industry mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1523-1533.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Local labour market; multiplier; tradable; nontradable; unemployment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa15p146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.