IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vlg/vlgwps/2001-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are acquisitions worhtwhile? An empirical study of the post-acquisition performance of privately held Belgian companies involved in take-overs

Author

Listed:
  • Tine De Langhe
  • Hubert Ooghe

    (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School)

Abstract

Few studies have addressed the performance of smaller unquoted companies involved in take-overs, especially in the Continental European countries. Therefore this study addresses the post-take-over financial characteristics of privately held companies involved in 143 Belgian take-overs between 1992 and 1994. Specifically, this paper examines the financial performance of the acquiring firm after the take-over, using statistical analysis of industry-adjusted variables. Our findings show that following the take-over, the profitability, the solvency and the liquidity of most of the combined companies decline. This decline is also reflected in the failure prediction scores. With respect to the added value, take-overs are found to be accompanied by increases in the labour productivity, caused by the general improvement of gross added value per employee of Belgian companies in the last ten years and partly caused by laying off the target's workers. So it seems that, contrary to the general expectations and beliefs, take-overs usually do not seem to improve the acquirer's financial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tine De Langhe & Hubert Ooghe, 2002. "Are acquisitions worhtwhile? An empirical study of the post-acquisition performance of privately held Belgian companies involved in take-overs," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2001-12, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
  • Handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2001-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.vlerick.com/en/2770-VLK/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/vlgms-wp-2001-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2001-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Isabelle Vandenbroere (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vlgmsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.