IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uca/ucapdv/33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hotelling competition on quality in the health care market

Author

Listed:
  • Montefiori, Marcello

Abstract

This paper aims to theoretically analyse recent health system reforms. Generally patients are free to choose, within the region they live in, the best provider among the private "accredited" and public ones. The criterion patients use to choose the provider which fits their expectations best is not, at least in a tax financed system, the price of the treatment since patients do not pay directly for the treatment they receive. Crucial in determining their choice is the quality level and the provider spatial location. In a normative perspective we want to analyse hospitals' Nash/Counot and Stackelberg equilibriums in a Hotelling spatial competition scenario. Because of asymmetric information, patients could be unable to observe the true quality provided. Thus the demand for health care services is assumed to depend on a perceived quality (different from true quality). New equilibrium outcomes are investigated when patient choice is affected by uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Montefiori, Marcello, 2003. "Hotelling competition on quality in the health care market," POLIS Working Papers 33, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    • Handle: RePEc:uca:ucapdv:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aBCTz-nMaXBx7xZ9ssHC317vkGZET7GP/view?usp=sharing
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chalkley, Martin & Malcomson, James M., 1998. "Contracting for health services when patient demand does not reflect quality," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Locatelli-Biey, Marilena & Zanola, Roberto, 2000. "The Market for Sculptures: an Adjacent Year Regression Index," POLIS Working Papers 14, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    3. Montrucchio, Luigi & Privileggi, Fabio, 2001. "On Fragility of Bubbles in Equilibrium Asset Pricing Models of Lucas-Type," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 158-188, November.
    4. Amisano, Franco, 2002. "La corruzione amministrativa in una burocrazia di tipo concorrenziale: modelli di analisi economica," POLIS Working Papers 29, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    5. Cassone, Alberto & Marchese, Carla, 2001. "Einaudi e i servizi pubblici, ovvero come contrastare i monopolisti predoni e la burocrazia corrotta," POLIS Working Papers 17, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    6. Mario Ferrero, 2005. "Radicalization as a reaction to failure: An economic model of Islamic extremism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 199-220, January.
    7. Ortona, Guido, 2002. "Choosing the electoral system: why not simply the best one?," POLIS Working Papers 30, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    8. Marchese, Carla & Privileggi, Fabio, 2001. "Who participates in tax amnesties? Self-selection of risk-averse taxpayers," POLIS Working Papers 21, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    9. Cassone, Alberto & Marchese, Carla, 2001. "Should the death tax die? And should it leave an inheritance?," POLIS Working Papers 22, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    10. Bondonio, Daniele, 2002. "Evaluating the Employment Impact of Business Incentive Programs in EU Disadvantaged Areas. A case from Northern Italy," POLIS Working Papers 27, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    11. Guido Ortona, 2000. "On the Xenophobia of non-discriminated Ethnic Minorities," POLIS Working Papers 15, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    12. Bondonio, Daniele, 2001. "Evaluating Decentralized Policies: How to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programs across Different Regions or States," POLIS Working Papers 16, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    13. Ottone, Stefania, 2001. "L'altruismo: atteggiamento irrazionale, strategia vincente o amore per il prossimo?," POLIS Working Papers 19, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    14. Ferrero, Mario, 1999. "A model of political enterprise," POLIS Working Papers 9, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    15. Ferruccio Ponzano, 2001. "Efficiency wages and endogenous supervision technology," POLIS Working Papers 23, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    16. Marchese, Carla & Privileggi, Fabio, 1997. "Taxpayers' Attitudes toward Risk and Amnesty Participation: Economic Analysis and Evidence for the Italian Case," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 52(3-4), pages 394-410.
    17. Ravazzi, Stefania, 2001. "La lettura contemporanea del cosiddetto dibattito fra Hobbes e Hume," POLIS Working Papers 18, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    18. Guido Ortona, 1999. "A weighted-voting electoral system that performs quite well," POLIS Working Papers 4, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    19. Zanola, Roberto, 2000. "Public goods versus publicly provided private goods in a two-class economy," POLIS Working Papers 12, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    20. Bissey, Marie-Edith & Ortona, Guido, 2002. "A simulative frame to study the integration of defectors in a cooperative setting," POLIS Working Papers 24, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefania Ottone, 2008. "Are people Samaritans or Avengers?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(10), pages 1-3.
    2. Bissey, Marie-Edith & Canegallo, Claudia & Ortona, Guido & Scacciati, Francesco, 2003. "Competition vs. Cooperation. An Experimental Inquiry," POLIS Working Papers 37, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    3. Guido Ortona & Stefania Ottone & Ferruccio Ponzano, 2008. "A Simulative Assessment of the Italian Electoral System," Springer Books, in: Fabio Padovano & Roberto Ricciuti (ed.), Italian Institutional Reforms: A Public Choice Perspective, chapter 0, pages 21-36, Springer.
    4. Ottone, Stefania, 2004. "Transfers and Altruistic Punishments in Third Party Punishment Game Experiments," POLIS Working Papers 41, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    5. Giovanni B. Ramello, 2006. "What'S In A Sign ? Trademark Law And Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 547-565, September.
    6. Bia, Michela, 2007. "The Propensity Score method in public policy evaluation: a survey," POLIS Working Papers 79, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    7. Mitra, Tapan & Privileggi, Fabio, 2006. "Cantor type attractors in stochastic growth models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 626-637.
    8. Gobbi, Michela, 2003. "A Viable Alternative: the Scandinavian Model of "Social Democracy"," POLIS Working Papers 32, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    9. Carla Marchese, 2009. "Rewarding the Consumer for Curbing the Evasion of Commodity Taxes?," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 65(4), pages 383-402, December.
    10. Marchese, Carla & Montefiori, Marcello, 2005. "Mean voting rule and strategical behavior: an experiment," POLIS Working Papers 49, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    11. Bernardi, Luigi & Fraschini, Angela, 2005. "Tax system and tax reforms in India," POLIS Working Papers 45, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    12. Nicita Antonio & Ramello Giovanni B., 2007. "Property, Liability and Market Power: The Antitrust Side of Copyright," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 767-791, December.
    13. Cugno, Franco & Ottoz, Elisabetta, 2006. "Static inefficiency of compulsory licensing: Quantity vs. price competition," POLIS Working Papers 73, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    14. Bissey, Marie-Edith & Ortona, Guido, 2007. "The program for the simulation of electoral systems ALEX4.1: what it does and how to use it," POLIS Working Papers 82, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    15. Breton, Albert & Fraschini, Angela, 2004. "Intergovernmental equalization grants: some fundamental principles," POLIS Working Papers 39, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    16. Ponzano, Ferruccio, 2005. "Competition among different levels of government: the re-election problem," POLIS Working Papers 47, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    17. Marchese, Carla & Privileggi, Fabio, 2007. "Increasing the efficiency of the 'Studi di Settore' might backfire," POLIS Working Papers 83, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    18. Bia, Michela & Mattei, Alessandra, 2007. "Application of the Generalized Propensity Score. Evaluation of public contributions to Piedmont enterprises," POLIS Working Papers 80, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
    19. Marie-Edith Bissey & Mauro Carini & Guido Ortona, 2004. "ALEX3: a Simulation Program to Compare Electoral Systems," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 7(3), pages 1-3.
    20. Giovanni B. Ramello & Francesco Silva, 2006. "Appropriating signs and meaning: the elusive economics of trademark," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(6), pages 937-963, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uca:ucapdv:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucia Padovani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.digspes.uniupo.it .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.