IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tsa/wpaper/0031mss.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment of Agreement Between Two Methods with Replicated Observations

Author

Listed:
  • Anuradha Roy

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)

Abstract

We study the problem of assessing the agreement between two methods with any number of replicated observations using linear mixed effects (LME) model in a doubly multivariate set-up. This method can also be used in the case of unbalanced designs when number of replications for each patient is unequal, as well as when the number of replications for each patient by respective methods is unequal. This method can easily incorporate any covariate, especially categorical to substantiate its effect on the method assessment. The model is implemented using MIXED procedure of SAS. We demonstrate our method with three real data sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Anuradha Roy, 2007. "Assessment of Agreement Between Two Methods with Replicated Observations," Working Papers 0008, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    • Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0031mss
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://interim.business.utsa.edu/wps/MSS/0008MSS-253-2007.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Assessment of Agreement; Kronecker Product; Maximum Likelihood Estimates; Mixed Effects Model; Replicated Observations; PROC MIXED;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0031mss. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wendy Frost (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbutsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.