IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/thk/wpaper/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wage Increases, Transfers, and the Socially Determined Income Distribution in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Lance Taylor

    (New School for Social Research)

  • Armon Rezai

    (Vienna University of Economics)

  • Rishabh Kumar

    (New School for Social Research)

  • Nelson Barbosa

    (Sao Paulo School of Economics)

  • Laura de Carvalho

    (Sao Paulo School of Economics)

Abstract

This paper is based on a social accounting matrix (SAM) which incorporates the size distribution distribution study, and BLS consumer surveys. Sources and uses of incomes are disaggregated by household groups including the top 1%. Their importance (including saving rates) differs fiscal (broadly progressive) and financial (regressive) channels. A third major flow over time has been a ten percentage point increase in the GDP share of the top 1%. A simulation model is used to illustrate how reasonable modifications to tax/transfer programs and increasing low wages cannot offset the historical redistribution toward the well-to-do.

Suggested Citation

  • Lance Taylor & Armon Rezai & Rishabh Kumar & Nelson Barbosa & Laura de Carvalho, 2014. "Wage Increases, Transfers, and the Socially Determined Income Distribution in the USA," Working Papers Series 11, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    • Handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:11
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2638042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2638042
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2139/ssrn.2638042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Setterfield, Mark & Kim, Yun K., 2016. "Debt servicing, aggregate consumption, and growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 22-33.
    2. Lance Taylor, 2014. "The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard Keynes," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 4-17, July.
    3. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Wealth inequality and aggregate demand," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 405-424, May.
    4. Rezai, Armon & Taylor, Lance & Foley, Duncan, 2018. "Economic Growth, Income Distribution, and Climate Change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 164-172.
    5. Lance Taylor, 2014. "Modeling Distribution and Growth: Replies to Garbellini and Wirkierman, Harcourt, and Nell," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 44-54, July.
    6. Lance Taylor & Ozlem Omer & Armon Rezai, 2015. "Wealth Concentration, Income Distribution, and Alternatives for the USA," Working Papers Series 17, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    7. Rishabh Kumar, 2015. "Thrift, stagnation and wealth distribution in a two class economy with applications to the United States," Working Papers 1506, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2015.
    8. Mark Setterfield, 2015. "Time variation in the size of the multiplier: a Kalecki-Harrod approach," Working Papers 1522, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2017.
    9. Servaas Storm, 2023. "Lance Taylor (1940–2022): Reconstructing Macroeconomics," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 1331-1353, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution
    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pia Malaney (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inetnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.