IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2805296.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teaching In Higher Education: Good Teaching Trough Students' Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Fadia Nasser-Abu Alhija

    (Tel Aviv University)

Abstract

Effective or quality teaching is considered as essential for student learning, academic attainment, and contribution to society. Much of the research on university teaching has been devoted to investigating faculty views of regarding quality teaching, outstanding teachers and students' satisfaction. In order to translate findings regarding student satisfaction to actions for advancing quality teaching, it is crucial to learn about students' perceptions of quality teaching. In other words, issues related to major components of quality teaching and thinks that teachers should do in order to excel still to be addressed. An internet survey was forwarded during the year 2014 to students in all higher education institutions in Israel. The sample included 2475 participants who are distributed by gender, age, type of higher education institution, field of study, type of degree and year of study. A two-part internet survey was used. The first part included questions concerning students' personal and academic background variables (gender, age, higher education institution, field of study, degree, and year of study). The second part included 29 items referring to six dimensions of quality teaching: intellectually challenging teaching, advancing non-academic skills, fostering creative thinking, constructive relations with students, clear instruction, and valid and reliable assessment. Reliability coefficients (Cronbach's ?) are .61-.82. Students perceive clear and well-organized teaching and valid and reliable assessment methods as most important dimensions of quality teaching (M=4.45 and M=4.40; respectively). The perceived importance of the other dimensions in descending order: Advancing students' creative thinking (M=4.26); advancing constructive relations with students (M=4.18); Provoking intellectual challenge (M=4.09); and advancing non-academic skills (M=3.79). Results from MANOVA revealed significant gender differences whereby women perceived all dimensions as more important than men do. Furthermore, students in humanities ascribe significantly greater importance to five of the six dimensions of teaching quality, compared to their peers in other fields of study. Students from all fields of study assign similar [low] importance to advancing non-academic skills. The effects of the other personal and academic variables were less prominent. The findings from the current study suggest that students do not always concur on their perceptions regarding the components of good teaching. The fact that gender and field of study affect students' perception of quality teaching can be interpreted as providing evidence against a uniform policy model for advancement of teaching quality in higher education institutions in Israel, and maybe worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadia Nasser-Abu Alhija, 2015. "Teaching In Higher Education: Good Teaching Trough Students' Lens," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2805296, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2805296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/19th-international-academic-conference-florence/table-of-content/detail?cid=28&iid=095&rid=5296
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Good teaching; higher education; students' perceptions; teaching dimensions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2805296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.