This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Computational Experiments and Reality

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
John Geweke () (University of Minnesota)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

A common practice in macroeconomics is to assess the validity of general equilibrium models by first deriving their implications for population moments and then comparing population moments with observed sample moments. Generally the population moments are not explicit functions of model parameters, and so computational experiments are used to establish the link between parameters and moments. In most cases the general equilibrium models are intended to describe certain population moments (for example, means) but not others (for example, variances). The comparison of population moments with observed sample moments is informal, a process that has been termed calibration by some economists and ocular econometrics by others. This paper provides a formal probability framework within which this approach to inference can be studied. There are two principle results. First, if general equilibrium models are taken as predictive for sample moments, then the formal econometrics of model evaluation and comparison are straightforward. The fact that the models describe only a subset of moments presents no obstacles, and the formal econometrics yield as a byproduct substantial insights into the workings of models. Second, if general equilibrium models are taken to establish implications for population moments but not sample moments, then there is no link to reality because population moments are unobserved. Under this assumption, atheoretical macroeconomic models that link population and sample moments can be introduced coherently into the formal econometrics of model evaluation and comparison. The result is a framework that unifies general equilibrium models (theory without measurement) and atheoretical econometrics (measurement without theory). The paper illustrates these using some models of the equity premium.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 with number 401.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 19 Mar 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:401

Contact details of provider:
Postal: CEF99, Boston College, Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA
Fax: +1-617-552-2308
Web page: http://fmwww.bc.edu/CEF99/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create a compilation of all publications of a group of people, say alumni of a program, your students or memers of an association.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.