2) of e to the value of the optimized LQEG performance index, J*(x(t-1),N). Expanding J*(x(t-1),N) in a Taylor series in v(x(t-1),N) and using some matrix differentiation rules of MacRae (1974), Karp derived an algorithm for computing a two-term approximation of J*(x(t-1),N) based on the 2nd and 4th moments of e (odd moments of e are zero). The complexity of MacRae's differentiation rules apparently dissuaded Karp from attempting to derive equations for computing higher-order (> 2) terms based on higher moments (> 4) of e.The present paper extends Karp's results in three ways. (1) Using a much simpler approach to matrix differentiation based on total-differential rather than partial-derivative forms of matrix derivatives (Magnus and Neudecker, 1988), the paper derives a simple recursion for computing any moments of a Gaussian random vector. (2) Using this result, the paper derives and applies an algorithm for computing any k-term Taylor approximation of J*(x(t-1),N), for finite N, based on moments 2, ..., 2k of e. (3) Using the perturbation method (Judd, 1998, chs. 13-14), the paper obtains corresponding results for infinite N. Result (3) illustrates the role of higher Gaussian moments in accurate perturbation solution of nonlinear dynamic stochastic economic models (cf., Chen and Zadrozny, 2000).">

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Computing Higher Moments In The Linear-Quadratic-Exponential-Gaussian Optimal Control Problem

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Baoline Chen, Peter A. Zadrozny (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Consider the discrete-time state equation and feedback control rule (1) x(t) = Fx(t-1) + Gu(t) + e(t), (2) u(t) = Px(t-1), where x is an nx1 state vector, u is an mx1 control variable, and e is an nx1 disturbance distributed NIID(0,S), F and G are nxn and nxm parameter matrices, and P is an mxn feedback control matrix. The ordinary linear-quadratic (LQ) performance index is (3) v(x(t-1),N) = [x(t-1)'Qx(t-1) + u(t)'Ru(t)] + d[x(t)'Qx(t) + u(t+1)'Ru(t+1)] + ... + d^N[x(t+N-1)'Qx(t+N-1) + u(t+N)'Ru(t+N)], where N is a finite or infinite planning horizon, 0 < d < or = 1 is a time-discounting parameter, and Q and R are given nxn and mxm, positive semidefinite and positive definite, preference parameter matrices. Then, the linear-quadratic-exponential-Gaussian (LQEG) performance index is (4) J(x(t-1),N) = (1/r)E{exp[rv(x(t-1),N)]|t-1}, where E{. |t-1} denotes expectation conditioned on variables realized by the end of period t-1 and r is a risk-preference parameter (r <, =, or > 0, respectively, indicates risk "preference, neutrality, or avoidance"). The discrete-time LQEG problem is: given x(t-1), N, and the parameters, minimize (4) with respect to P, subject to (1)-(2).Jacobson (1973) proved that, for N finite, the optimal P is obtained by iterating on a discrete-time recursive Riccati equation. As N approaches infinity, the equation converges to a nonrecursive or algebraic Riccati equation, which can be solved quickly and accurately using the Schur-decomposition method (Laub, 1979). Karp (1985) addressed the problem of determining the contribution of higher moments (> 2) of e to the value of the optimized LQEG performance index, J*(x(t-1),N). Expanding J*(x(t-1),N) in a Taylor series in v(x(t-1),N) and using some matrix differentiation rules of MacRae (1974), Karp derived an algorithm for computing a two-term approximation of J*(x(t-1),N) based on the 2nd and 4th moments of e (odd moments of e are zero). The complexity of MacRae's differentiation rules apparently dissuaded Karp from attempting to derive equations for computing higher-order (> 2) terms based on higher moments (> 4) of e.The present paper extends Karp's results in three ways. (1) Using a much simpler approach to matrix differentiation based on total-differential rather than partial-derivative forms of matrix derivatives (Magnus and Neudecker, 1988), the paper derives a simple recursion for computing any moments of a Gaussian random vector. (2) Using this result, the paper derives and applies an algorithm for computing any k-term Taylor approximation of J*(x(t-1),N), for finite N, based on moments 2, ..., 2k of e. (3) Using the perturbation method (Judd, 1998, chs. 13-14), the paper obtains corresponding results for infinite N. Result (3) illustrates the role of higher Gaussian moments in accurate perturbation solution of nonlinear dynamic stochastic economic models (cf., Chen and Zadrozny, 2000).

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 with number 310.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 05 Jul 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:310

Contact details of provider:
Postal: CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain
Fax: +34 93 542 17 46
Email:
Web page: http://enginy.upf.es/SCE/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2008-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.