IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rut/rutres/199827.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Experimental Test For Stability Of The Probability Transformation Function In Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Gigliotti

    (Rutgers University)

  • Barry Sopher

    (Rutgers University)

  • Roger Klein

    (Rutgers University)

Abstract

We conduct an experiment to (i) measure the structure of preferences over lotteries and (ii) test for stability of the probability transformation functions over different choice sets. The design is based on manipulations of the "probability triangle" A disaggregated nonparametric analysis in which we classify subjects according to which transformation function is most consistent with their revealed choice behavior shows that a linear and a strictly concave transformation function are the most common for risky choice. We find essentially no evidence of an S-shaped transformation function for choice under risk. Formal econometric estimation clearly rejects the S-shaped function in favor a strictly concave function. The difference between our results and those of previous studies can be attributed to the choice of functional forms used in estimating the transformation function, to the limited space of lotteries upon which estimates have been based, and to the certainty-equivalent method used to elicit responses in those studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Gigliotti & Barry Sopher & Roger Klein, 1998. "An Experimental Test For Stability Of The Probability Transformation Function In Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory," Departmental Working Papers 199827, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:199827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rut:rutres:199827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.