The fact that the famous price index of Laspeyres is unable to pass the so called inversion test (IT) gave rise to the idea that this formula tends to measure "spurious inflation" which renders it useless and fallacious. In the IT prices and quantities of n goods, relating to two periods, the base period 0 and the current period t are interchanged in way that the sums of prices, quantities as well as values (products of prices and quantities) remain constant. It therefore appears nonsensical that Laspeyres' price index nonetheless indicates "inflation" under such conditions. Yet this result can be explained and justified. The paper shows that violation of the IT does not prove uselessness of an index function. On the contrary a number of good reasons can be given why compliance with the IT does not at all make a formula preferable to other formulas and that the message of the IT and its relation to other tests is rather dubious.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
7045.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.