IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/cfeaaa/2012-10-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accountability in Decentralised Employment Service Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Hugh Mosley

Abstract

The Accountability in Decentralised Employment Service Regimes report, prepared by independent expert Hugh Mosely, compares and contrasts four OECD countries with decentralised delivery systems for managing active labour market policy (Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark). This report contextualises the findings of the OECD LEED "Managing Accountability and Flexibility" study in current academic discussions relating to new performance management and accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugh Mosley, 2012. "Accountability in Decentralised Employment Service Regimes," OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers 2012/10, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:cfeaaa:2012/10-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k98sbxn9wbw-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k98sbxn9wbw-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k98sbxn9wbw-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lukas Mergele, 2016. "Are there gains from decentralizing public employment offices?," Working Papers 2015020, Berlin Doctoral Program in Economics and Management Science (BDPEMS).
    2. Ohto Kanninen & Hannu Karhunen & Jeremias Nieminen, 2021. "Behavior and Effectiveness of Decentralized Employment Offices," Working Papers 332, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:cfeaaa:2012/10-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.