IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nwu/cmsems/1180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Information Theoretic Comparison of Model Selection Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Dean P. Foster
  • Robert A. Stine

Abstract

Information theory offers a coherent perspective on model selection. As in Rissanen's original application of information theory to model selection, our perspective arises from viewing a model as a component of a compressed representation of data in a two-part code. The first part of such a code is an explicit representation of the model used to compress the data. Simpler models have shorter representations. The second part is the encoded data itself. Models which fit better compress the data into shorter sequences. The objective is to choose the model which produces the shortest total message length, requiring an explicit trade-off of model complexity (length of the first part) versus goodness-of-fit (length of second part). In adidtion to Rissanen's MDL criterion, this perspective illuminates the properties of numerous model selection criteria, including AIC, Cp, BIC, RIC, and EBIC. We show that each corresponds to a specific way of coding the model parameters. By selecting the model that minimizes the total message length, our representations of these criteria reproduce their more familiar definitions. Examples from wavelets illustrate the use of these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean P. Foster & Robert A. Stine, 1997. "An Information Theoretic Comparison of Model Selection Criteria," Discussion Papers 1180, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/1180.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fran Walker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cmnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.