IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/npf/wpaper/19-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Whether States have Capacity to Sustain Projected Growth in GST Collection during the Compensation Period?

Author

Listed:
  • Mukherjee, Sacchidananda

    (National Institute of Public Finance and Policy)

Abstract

Achieving harmonisation in design, structure and administration of taxes on goods and services was the major driving force behind the introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. GST subsumes many taxes from both Union and State tax bases. Achieving tax harmonisation in a federal system curtails fiscal autonomy of both the Union and sub-national governments and therefore faces steep resistance. Revenue uncertainty associated with any tax reform is a major cause for concern for all governments and therefore the assurance of revenue protection given by the Union government to States helped to achieve broad consensus in favour of GST. On average State taxes subsumed under the GST used to contribute two-third of own tax revenue and finance one-third of total expenditure for general category States. Unlike the Union government, States have limited taxation power (tax handles) to generate additional revenue to cope up with any major revenue shortfall on account of GST collection. Therefore the revenue protection enshrined under the GST Compensation Act has played an important role behind introduction of GST in India. This has also helped the GST Council to experiment with design, structure and administration of GST during the GST compensation period (first five years of GST implementation) to moderate the impact of GST on Indian economy as well as facilitate ease of tax compliance. Given the ongoing shortfall in GST collection, many scholars believe that liberal GST revenue protection granted under the GST Compensation Act to states is unjustifiable. The GST compensation period will be over by June 2022 and thereafter GST collection of individual States is expected to depend on their tax capacity as well as tax effort. It is worthy to investigate whether states have tax capacity to sustain 14 percent growth rate in tax collection, as projected in the GST Compensation Act. The objective of this paper is to estimate tax capacity of the states with reference to major tax revenue subsumed under GST and see whether states could sustain 14 percent growth in their GST collection during the GST compensation period if they put adequate tax effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2019. "Whether States have Capacity to Sustain Projected Growth in GST Collection during the Compensation Period?," Working Papers 19/275, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:19/275
    Note: Working Paper 275, 2019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nipfp.org.in/media/medialibrary/2019/07/WP_275_2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandhya Garg & Ashima Goyal & Rupayan Pal, 2017. "Why Tax Effort Falls Short of Tax Capacity in Indian States," Public Finance Review, , vol. 45(2), pages 232-259, March.
    2. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2020. "Inter-governmental Fiscal Transfers in the Presence of Revenue Uncertainty: The Case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 74-102, January.
    3. Ajit Karnik & Swati Raju, 2015. "State Fiscal Capacity and Tax Effort: Evidence for Indian States," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 4(2), pages 141-177, December.
    4. Garg, Sandya & Ashima Goyal & Rupayan Pal, 2014. "Why tax effort falls short of capacity in Indian states: A Stochastic frontier approach," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2014-032, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    5. Federico Belotti & Silvio Daidone & Giuseppe Ilardi & Vincenzo Atella, 2013. "Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(4), pages 718-758, December.
    6. Battese, George E. & Coelli, Tim J., 1988. "Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 387-399, July.
    7. Rao,R. Kavita & Mukherjee,Sacchidananda, 2019. "Evolution of Goods and Services Tax in India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108473965.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2020. "Estimation and Projection of Petroleum Demand and Tax Collection from Petroleum Sector in India," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(1), pages 39-68, June.
    2. Tandon, Suranjali & Rao, R. Kavita, 2019. "Frontier analysis for State Excise in India," Working Papers 19/276, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    3. Mukherjee, Sacchidandanda, 2020. "Possible Impact of Withdrawal of GST Compensation Post GST Compensation Period on Indian State Finances," Working Papers 20/291, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    4. Nayudu, A. Sri Hari, 2019. "Tax Revenue Efficiency of Indian States: The case of Stamp Duty and Registration Fees," Working Papers 19/278, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    5. Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Indian GST: State-level Analysis of Compliance Gap and Revenue Growth," Working Papers 20/301, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    6. Chakraborty, Lekha, 2019. "Gender Budgeting as PFM in OECD Countries: Empirical Evidence from Sweden," Working Papers 19/277, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2020. "Goods and Services Tax efficiency across Indian States: panel stochastic frontier analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 225-251, December.
    2. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, 2019. "Whether States Have Capacity to Sustain Projected Growth in GST Collection During the GST Compensation Period?," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 11(1-2), pages 30-53, April.
    3. Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2017. "Changing Tax Capacity and Tax Effort of Indian States in the Era of High Economic Growth, 2001-2014," Working Papers 17/196, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    4. Jaime Valles-Gimenez & Anabel Zarate-Marco, 2017. "Tax Effort of Local Governments and its Determinants: The Spanish Case," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 18(2), pages 323-348, November.
    5. Zárate Marco, Anabel & Vallés Giménez, Jaime, 2019. "Regional tax effort in Spain," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-32.
    6. Avipsa Mohanty & Dinabandhu Sethi & Asit Ranjan Mohanty, 2022. "Does petroleum tax revenue drive sales tax effort of Indian states? A stochastic frontier approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 1257-1268, January.
    7. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:valles-gimenez is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Danuse Nerudova & Marian Dobranschi, 2019. "Alternative method to measure the VAT gap in the EU: Stochastic tax frontier model approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, January.
    9. Longjin Chen, 2021. "Tax enforcement interactions among Chinese provinces: A frontier and spatial analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 332-348, March.
    10. Victor Moutinho & Mara Madaleno, 2021. "Assessing Eco-Efficiency in Asian and African Countries Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Rosen Azad Chowdhury & Dilshad Jahan & Tapas Mishra & Mamata Parhi, 2023. "A Quality Dimension? A Re-appraisal of Financial Development and Economic Growth Nexus in a Quality-Quantity Setting," Working Papers 2023-02, Swansea University, School of Management.
    12. Sabrina Auci & Laura Castellucci & Manuela Coromaldi, 2021. "How does public spending affect technical efficiency? Some evidence from 15 European countries," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 108-130, January.
    13. Forgione, Antonio Fabio & Migliardo, Carlo, 2023. "Mafia risk perception: Evaluating the effect of organized crime on firm technical efficiency and investment proclivity," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. James I. Price & Steven Renzetti & Diane Dupont & Wiktor Adamowicz & Monica B. Emelko, 2017. "Production Costs, Inefficiency, and Source Water Quality: A Stochastic Cost Frontier Analysis of Canadian Water Utilities," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 93(1), pages 1-11.
    15. Horvath, Akos & Lang, Peter, 2021. "Do loan subsidies boost the real activity of small firms?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Idaira Cabrera‐Suárez & Jorge V. Pérez‐Rodríguez, 2021. "Bank branch performance and cost efficiency: A stochastic frontier panel data approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5850-5863, October.
    17. Kovárník Richard & Staňková Michaela, 2023. "Efficiency of the Automotive Industry in the Visegrad Group," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 12-23, January.
    18. Rao, Xudong, 2014. "Land Fragmentation with Double Bonuses -- The Case of Tanzanian Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Sami Jarboui, 2022. "Operational and environmental efficiency of U.S. oil and gas companies towards energy transition policies: A comparative empirical analysis," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 234-257, June.
    20. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Robin C. Sickles & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "What do we know from the vast literature on efficiency and productivity in healthcare? A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP092021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    21. Marc Rohde & Christoph Breuer, 2018. "Competing by investments or efficiency? Exploring financial and sporting efficiency of club ownership structures in European football," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 563-581, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sales Tax ; Value Added Tax (VAT) ; Goods and Services Tax (GST) ; Revenue Projection ; Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) ; Fiscal Autonomy.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:19/275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S.Siva Chidambaram (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nipfp.org.in .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.