IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kbb/dpaper/2015-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

To What Extent Do Public Interest and Private Interest Affect Regulations? An Empirical Investigation of Firms in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Fumitoshi Mizutani

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University)

  • Eri Nakamura

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University)

Abstract

Through an empirical analysis of firms in Japan, this paper investigates to what extent the public interest and the private interest theories, respectively, explain the actual regulatory process. Our estimation findings are as follows. First, the explanatory power of the public interest theory is higher in non-public utility industries, while that of the private interest theory is higher in public utility industries. Second, rapidly growing industries become less regulated as they no longer need government protection. Third, highly competitive industries become more regulated so as to retain profit for individual companies. Fourth, price level has different implications among industries. The negative coefficient in non-public utility industries supports the public interest theory, while the positive coefficient in public utility industries supports the private interest theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2015. "To What Extent Do Public Interest and Private Interest Affect Regulations? An Empirical Investigation of Firms in Japan," Discussion Papers 2015-21, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2015-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.b.kobe-u.ac.jp/papers_files/2015_21.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Determinants of regulation; Corporate governance; Public interest theory; Private interest theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L44 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Antitrust Policy and Public Enterprise, Nonprofit Institutions, and Professional Organizations
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2015-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yasuyuki Miyahara (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bskobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.