IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ivc/wpaper/200806.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regional Development Platform based on ‘Related Variety’: Some Evidences from Tuscany

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Capone

    (Dept. of Business Economics, University of Florence)

  • Luciana Lazzeretti

    (Dept. of Business Economics, University of Florence)

  • Tommaso Cinti

    (Dept. of Business Economics, University of Florence)

Abstract

A recent contribution to regional/local development is the Regional Development Platform (RDP), a tool oflocal policy and governance meant for the planning and implementation of a regional innovation systemwith a sustainable and long-lasting competitive advantage. The aim of the present work is to contribute to the debate on local economic development throughplatforms of regional development, offering some specific cases in which the RDP model is developed notonly as a top-down policy tool in support to innovation, but also as a bottom-up governance tool for therelationships among cognitively-related industries. Finally, we also introduce the idea of the platform as ‘apublic space’ able to foster ideas and innovations through cross-fertilisation according to a Related-varietyapproach.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Capone & Luciana Lazzeretti & Tommaso Cinti, 2008. "Regional Development Platform based on ‘Related Variety’: Some Evidences from Tuscany," Working Papers 200806, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
  • Handle: RePEc:ivc:wpaper:200806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.orkestra.deusto.es/images/investigacion/publicaciones/papers/000001_WPS2008-06-(EN).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luciana Lazzeretti & Francesco Capone & Tommaso Cinti, 2009. "The Regional Development Platform and “Related Variety”: Some Evidence from Art and Food in Tuscany," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 27-45, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ivc:wpaper:200806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Asier Murciego (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ordeues.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.