IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp01563.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Axiometic Characterization of Budget Constrained Pareto Efficient Social Choice for Fair Division Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Lahiri Somdeb

Abstract

In recent times, beginning with the work of Thomson [1988], attention in social choice theory has focused on problems of fair division. The problem is one of dividing a social endowment among a group of agents keeping in mind the issues of equity and efficiency. There is a sizeable literature which has dealt with the problem of axiomatically characterizing the equal income market equilibrium solution. Notable among them are the works of Thomson [1988], Lahiri [1997, forthcoming]. In Thomson and Varian [1985], there is the concept of an income fair allocation. Basically, these are allocations which cost the same for all agents. However, the pirce vector at which the allocation is evaluated, is in the existing literature, endogenously determined by market forces, whence it coincides with equal income market equilibrium allocations. The income fairness concept derives appeal as an independent entity, only if the price at which the allocation is evaluated is specified exogenously. Along with efficiency, it then coincides with what Balasko [1979], calls budget constrained Pareto efficient allocations. To be relevant to the literature on fair division, it should be required that the monetary worth of the allocation at exogenously specified prices, be the same for all agents. In this paper, we axiomatically characterize the social choice correspondence, which picks for each economy, the set of equal income budget constrained Pareto efficient allocations. We are able to characterize this social choice correspondence uniquely, with the help of the following assumptions: Consistency, Equal Budget Property, Pareto efficiency for two agent problems and Local Independence. The most extensive use of Consistency is due to Thomson, as surveyed in Thomson [1990]; the equalbudget property is due to Varian [1976], Pareto efficiency for two agent problems is due to van der Nouweland, Peleg and Tijs [1996], Local Independence is due to Nagahisa [1991]. In a final section, we replace Consistency by Converse Consistency (Thomson [1990]) and Pareto Efficiency for two agent problems by Binary Efficiency (see Lahiri [1997] to obtain yet another axiomatic characterization of the same social choice correspondence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lahiri Somdeb, 1998. "Axiometic Characterization of Budget Constrained Pareto Efficient Social Choice for Fair Division Problems," IIMA Working Papers WP1998-11-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.