This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Endogeneity in count data models; an application to demand for health care

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Frank Windmeijer () (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Bristol)
Joao Santos Silva

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation technique is discussed for count data models with endogenous regressors. Count data models can be specified with additive or multiplicative errors and it is shown that, in general, a set of instruments is not orthogonal to both error types. Simultaneous equations with a dependent count variable often do not have a reduced form which is a simple function of the instruments. However, a simultaneous model with a count and a binary variable can only be logically consistent when the system is triangular. Utilizing data from the British Health and Lifestyle Survey 1991-1992, the GMM estimator is used in the estimation of a model explaining the number of visits to doctors, with a self-reported binary health index as a possible endogenous regressor. If this regressor is truly endogenous, one expects the pseudo-likelihood estimate of its coefficient to be biased upwards. Indeed, for the additive model, the estimated coefficient of the binary health index decreases in value when the possible endogeneity of this regressor is taken into account. Further indication of endogeneity is given by the fact that the overidentifying restrictions are rejected in the multiplicative model, but not in the additive model. Finally, a model that includes predicted latent health instead of the binary health index is estimated in stages.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute for Fiscal Studies in its series IFS Working Papers with number W96/15.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Aug 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:96/15

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Email:
Web page: http://www.ifs.org.uk

Order Information:
Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Emma Hyman).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use convenient plug-ins to search directly IDEAS from your browser.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-31.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.