IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02896003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On-line Appendix for 'Academic Entrepreneurship: Bayh-Dole versus the Professor’s Privilege'

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Astebro

    (Joseph L. Rotman School of Management - University of Toronto)

  • Serguey Braguinsky
  • Pontus Braunerhjelm

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Management - KTH - KTH Royal Institute of Technology [Stockholm])

  • Anders Broström

    (Division of Economics - KTH - KTH Royal Institute of Technology [Stockholm])

Abstract

Is the Bayh-Dole intellectual property regime associated with more and better academic entrepreneurship than the Professor Privilege regime? The authors examine data on US PhDs in the natural sciences, engineering, and medical fields who became entrepreneurs in 1993–2006 and compare this to similar data from Sweden. They find that, in both countries, those with an academic background have lower rates of entry into entrepreneurship than do those with a non-academic background. The relative rate of academics starting entrepreneurial firms is slightly lower in the United States than in Sweden. Moreover, the mean economic gains from becoming an entrepreneur are negative, both for PhDs originating in academia and non-academic settings in both countries. Analysis indicates that selection into entrepreneurship occurs from the lower part of the ability distribution among academics. The results suggest that policies aimed at supporting entrepreneurial decisions by younger, tenure-track academics may be more effective than general incentives at increasing academic entrepreneurship in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Astebro & Serguey Braguinsky & Pontus Braunerhjelm & Anders Broström, 2018. "On-line Appendix for 'Academic Entrepreneurship: Bayh-Dole versus the Professor’s Privilege'," Working Papers hal-02896003, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02896003
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3286994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02896003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.