IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00091025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Postal, Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys : How Comparable Are They?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Bonnel

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This workshop is dedicated to the discussion of the compatibility issues raised by the application of multiple survey instruments (home survey, phone survey, postal survey) in a given project. Two groups of circumstances are to be considered. In the first situation, different population segments are approached with different methods (for reasons of greater effectiveness) whilst trying to obtain the same type of information in all segments. In the second situation, two or more sequential survey operations are performed with different methodologies in an attempt to reach a greater proportion of the population under study. The key aspects to be discussed are the comparability of results obtained through those different instruments, and ways in which these different types of data might be integrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Bonnel, 2003. "Postal, Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys : How Comparable Are They?," Post-Print halshs-00091025, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00091025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Bonnel & Etienne Hombourger & Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond & Zbigniew Smoreda, 2015. "Passive Mobile Phone Dataset to Construct Origin-destination Matrix: Potentials and Limitations," Post-Print halshs-01664219, HAL.
    2. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2012. "Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1147-1171, November.
    3. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2015. "How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study," Post-Print halshs-01663683, HAL.
    4. Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart & Brett Smith, 2015. "Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes," Post-Print halshs-01663724, HAL.
    5. Mariem Fekih & Tom Bellemans & Zbigniew Smoreda & Patrick Bonnel & Angelo Furno & Stéphane Galland, 2021. "A data-driven approach for origin–destination matrix construction from cellular network signalling data: a case study of Lyon region (France)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1671-1702, August.
    6. Mirkan Geyik & Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart, 2016. "Impact of the choice of data collection method on mobility surveys [L’impact du mode de recueil des données sur la mobilité déclarée]," Working Papers halshs-01485226, HAL.
    7. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "Web and face-to-face travel surveys: how comparable are they? [Enquête déplacements web - face-à-face : quelle comparabilité ?]," Post-Print halshs-00566236, HAL.
    8. Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Madzlan Napiah & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Shabir Hussain Khahro, 2012. "Transportation Planning Survey Methodologies for the Proposed Study of Physical and Socio-economic Development of Deprived Rural Regions: A Review," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 1-1, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00091025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.